Teams

9 Westwood Snyder

2025 Richmond Singles · Richmond Singles 3.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-11-10vs 2 Hermitage AdamsLost 12
L#1 SinglesKevin Gill vs Tim Johnson4-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesGarrett Bunting vs David Blankley3-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesJohn Weiland vs Ted Jurkuta7-6, 6-1
2025-11-05vs 11 Burkwood 3.0 - ButterworthWon 21
L#1 SinglesAlex Arnett vs Andrew Hylton4-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesGareth Mancini vs Scott Childs6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesScott Lewis vs Adam Tuck6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesKevin Gill vs Chris Gaines6-2, 6-4
W#2 SinglesCory Snyder vs Dylan Holt6-2, 6-2
L#3 SinglesJohn Weiland vs Benton Boone7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2025-10-15vs 7 Westwood WestWon 21
W#1 SinglesKevin Gill vs Bailey White6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesAlex Arnett vs Bryce Madden6-2, 6-2
L#3 SinglesGarrett Bunting vs Sacha Shaygan3-6, 3-6
2025-10-04vs 4 CCV PahujaWon 20
W#1 SinglesMichael Creager vs Rishi Pahuja6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesJohn Weiland vs Michael Taliaferro6-3, 6-3
2025-09-24vs 6 Woodlake - ONeillWon 30
W#1 SinglesZachary Webb vs Alfred Gamulo7-6, 6-3
W#2 SinglesGarrett Bunting vs Thomas Zuend6-3, 6-4
W#3 SinglesPhilip Noonan vs Ryan Brown6-1, 6-4
2025-09-21vs 13 Chestnut Oaks CoyleWon 21
W#1 SinglesZachary Webb vs Marshall Powell6-2, 6-1
L#2 SinglesScott Lewis vs Michael Coyle2-6, 5-7
W#3 SinglesMichael Creager vs Lucas Ward6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Singles 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Kevin Gill
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.05
Scott Lewis
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
3.01
Cory Snyder
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.99
Michael Creager
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.97
Gareth Mancini
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.92
Alex Arnett
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.91
John Weiland
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.82
Philip Noonan
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.76
Garrett Bunting
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
2.74
Zachary Webb
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kevin Gill
11W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
Scott Lewis
18W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.05
3
Cory Snyder
18W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.01
Michael Creager
15W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
2.99
Gareth Mancini
8W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Alex Arnett
6W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%71%28%
2.92
John Weiland
18W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.91
Philip Noonan
8W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Garrett Bunting
6W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76
Zachary Webb
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%92%3%
2.74

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.