Teams

Lavergne/18/3.5-2.5/TRI/OCC

2025 LAF Tri Level 18 & Over - Women Night · 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 Laf (18&Over) Women Night

9 players · average NTRP 3.17 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-08-05vs Disotell/18/3.5-2.5/TRI/BEVRLost 12
L#1 DoublesBrennan Knight / Kathryn Glover vs Renee Ezell / Patti Broussard6-0, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJenci Lavergne / Tanya Zeringue vs Marci Gutheil / Claire Derge6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesChauntelle Crappell / Victoria Knott vs Tiffney Gonzales / Crystal Gray6-7, 5-7
2025-07-31vs Bolles/18/3.5-2.5/TRI/REDSLost 03
L#1 DoublesChauntelle Crappell / Felicia Smith vs Barbara Helveston / Madeleine Burch5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJenci Lavergne / Michelle Mixon vs Michelle Piccione / Parker Harrell3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKathryn Glover / Allie Vermaelen vs Mary McCullough / Priscilla Spain6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2025-07-17vs Dade/18/3.5-2.5/TRI/YSCWon 20
W#2 DoublesTanya Zeringue / Merritt Longman vs Lacey Carrigee / Paige Stinson6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesBrennan Knight / Allie Vermaelen vs Lindsey Chitwood / Emma Dowdy7-6, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 Laf (18&Over) Women Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
Victoria Knott
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.13
Chauntelle Crappell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.05
Jenci Lavergne
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.93
Tanya Zeringue
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.93
Brennan Knight
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.89
Merritt Longman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.81
Michelle Mixon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.61
Kathryn Glover
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.55
Allie Vermaelen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brennan Knight + Allie Vermaelen303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Victoria Knott
19W–30L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Chauntelle Crappell
14W–29L career · 2 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.13
Jenci Lavergne
19W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.05
Tanya Zeringue
13W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
Brennan Knight
8W–4L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.93
Merritt Longman
17W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.89
Michelle Mixon
21W–46L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%8%
2.81
Kathryn Glover
9W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%21%79%
2.61
3
Allie Vermaelen
14W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
2.55

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.