Teams

DAVIE STADIUM 18MX7.0A

2022 MIXED 18&Over · 18&Over MX7.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-03-20Won 10
W#3 DoublesFlorita Labrador / Salvador Labrador vs Isobel Gotto / David Green6-0, 6-4
2022-03-11vs WASHINGTON PK 18MX7.0AWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrian Miller / Florita Labrador vs Cody Gates / Anne Rainwater6-4, 6-3
2022-02-19vs WASHINGTON PK 18MX7.0AWon 10
W#2 DoublesLloyd Hohenstein / Florita Labrador vs Sang Woo Ham / Laura Sumrall7-6, 6-3
2022-02-06vs CHABOT CANYON 18MX7.0AWon 10
W#2 DoublesSalvador Labrador / Florita Labrador vs Debbie Chang / Aaron McCullough6-4, 7-5
2022-01-29vs SALESIAN HS 18MX7.0AWon 10
W#1 DoublesFlorita Labrador / Salvador Labrador vs Isobel Gotto / Aaron Ilan6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18&Over MX7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Matt Lourens
published
4.03
Harish Natarajan
published 4.5
3.75
Ritesh Bhandari
published
3.69
Lloyd Hohenstein
published
3.62
Tuesdai Powers
published
3.43
Sanna Garcia
published
3.40
Chad Harrison
published 3.5
3.37
Nga Gross
published
3.36
3.17
Salvador Labrador
published
2.93
Florita Labrador
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.92
Daljeet Singh
published 3.5
Kathleen Olson
published
Mary Akli
published
Venkat Prodhuturi
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Harish Natarajan + Daljeet Singh2437% gamesnot enough data
Salvador Labrador + Florita Labrador134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matt Lourens
35W–24L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
4.29
4.5
Harish Natarajan
15W–12L career · no lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
4.03
Ritesh Bhandari
15W–8L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
Lloyd Hohenstein
13W–10L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.69
Tuesdai Powers
24W–30L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.62
Sanna Garcia
13W–23L career · no lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Chad Harrison
5W–18L career · no lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.40
Nga Gross
17W–24L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.37
Stephanie Chamberlin
21W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.36
Salvador Labrador
1W–13L career · no lines in 2022
99%1%<1%
3.17
3
Florita Labrador
69W–72L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
2.93
3.5
Daljeet Singh
3W–25L career · no lines in 2022
73%27%<1%
2.92
Kathleen Olson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Akli
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Venkat Prodhuturi
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.