Teams

GSTL40/Trask/GrandeDunes

2024 Combo 40 & Over- GSTL · Adult WOMEN - 7.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-09-25vs GSTL40/Pavy/PrestwickLost 01
L#1 DoublesBonnie Trask / Diana Morgan vs Kimberly Case / Sarah LaPerle0-6, 2-6
2024-09-18vs GSTL40/Bass/DunesWon 10
W#3 DoublesAnna Kirby / Diana Morgan vs Becky Walls / Mary Singleton1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-08-14vs GSTL40/Pavy/PrestwickLost 01
L#3 DoublesAnna Kirby / Diana Morgan vs Heather Johnson / Myla Cabildo7-6, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult WOMEN - 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Sharon Durant
published
3.51
Anna Kirby
published 4
3.50
Wende Cover
published
3.44
Deborah Dempsey
published 3.5
3.42
Sandra Jerbert
published
3.41
Bonnie Trask
published 4
3.28
Karen Swartling
published
3.27
Annette Graham
published 3.5
3.26
Gayle Berkey
published
3.17
Sherri Meyers
published
3.06
Diana Morgan
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.68
Staci Bellamy
published
Dottie Kinlaw
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bonnie Trask + Sherri Meyers5258% games+10.5% vs expected
Annette Graham + Karen Swartling6357% games−2.2% vs expected
Annette Graham + Bonnie Trask224 matchesnot enough data
Deanne Johnson Stephens + Karen Swartling303 matchesnot enough data
Deanne Johnson Stephens + Bonnie Trask213 matchesnot enough data
Gayle Berkey + Wende Cover123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sharon Durant
9W–7L career · no lines in 2024
27%72%<1%
3.58
4
Anna Kirby
8W–6L career · no lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
3.51
Wende Cover
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
3.50
3.5
Deborah Dempsey
24W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%65%35%
3.44
4
Deanne Johnson Stephens
19W–11L career · no lines in 2024
71%29%<1%
3.42
Sandra Jerbert
7W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
3.42
4
Bonnie Trask
14W–12L career · no lines in 2024
73%27%<1%
3.41
Karen Swartling
20W–12L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Annette Graham
27W–12L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
Gayle Berkey
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
96%4%<1%
3.26
Sherri Meyers
18W–22L career · no lines in 2024
<1%11%89%
3.17
3.5
Diana Morgan
53W–74L career · 5 lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
3.06
Staci Bellamy
4W–11L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
2.68
Dottie Kinlaw
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.