Teams

LLAS UPTA18C/Woodall/Brookstone

Combo 18 & Over · Men 5.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-10-28vs LATA18/Dye/CTFCLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichael Woodall / Reece Berry vs DWIGHT SAWYER / John David Scheper0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBen Wiles / Shawn Knox vs Robert Dozier / Damon Remley2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesChris Troup / Ryan Camak vs Scott Prince / Chris Groves6-4, 7-6
2024-10-27vs LCTA18/Facello/MaybankLost 03
L#1 DoublesBen Wiles / Shawn Knox vs Michael Sweet / Michael Evans1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesChris Troup / Ryan Camak vs Justin McInnis / John Sottery3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJoseph Cope / Chris Burton vs Chris Facello / John McDougald5-7, 3-6
2024-10-27vs LATA18/MOODY/LCTCLost 12
W#1 DoublesBen Wiles / Shawn Knox vs Seth Hanna / Jeff Klaseus6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJoseph Cope / Chris Burton vs DJ Cox / David Bowen0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesChris Troup / Ryan Camak vs Sivakumar Shanmugam / Jon Davis2-6, 1-6
2024-10-26vs LCTA18/Rogers/DannyJonesLost 03
L#1 DoublesJoseph Cope / Chris Burton vs Charn Pitiranggon / Kevin Chisholm3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Woodall / Shawn Knox vs Grady Rogers / Slava Zeif0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesChris Troup / Ryan Camak vs Rudy Romano / Rob Dauch0-6, 0-6
2024-10-26vs LCTA18/Lawley/St. GeorgeSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJoseph Cope / Shawn Knox vs George Lamont Perry / James Brownlee1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesChris Troup / Ryan Camak vs Vic Simon / Richard Sutcliffe7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 5.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.08
Ben Wiles
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.96
Chris Troup
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.92
Edward Loescher
published
Jason Wimberly
published
Joseph Cope
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Reece Berry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Ryan Camak
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Shawn Knox
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Thomas Diggins
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chris Troup + Ryan Camak2338% gamesnot enough data
Shawn Knox + Ben Wiles123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ben Wiles
27W–10L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%29%71%
3.08
3
Chris Troup
31W–18L career · type A · 5 lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
2.96
Edward Loescher
11W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%28%
2.92
Jason Wimberly
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Joseph Cope
1W–8L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Reece Berry
1W–7L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Ryan Camak
3W–9L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Shawn Knox
1W–6L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Thomas Diggins
1W–9L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.