Teams

SWittek (Raintree)

2026 Combo Doubles 55 & Over League · 55 & Over Combo 6.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.12 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-09-10vs PReimann/JJZhu (Park Road)Split 11
L#1 DoublesKaren Allen / Lesly Carlton vs Zahide Marenic / Peggy Reimann0-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRona Karacaova / Staci Wittek vs Kate MacRone / Mary Wolf6-3, 6-2
2026-08-27vs KKuehner (Life Time)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesJulie Ackerlund / Lesly Carlton vs Debbie Alexander / Teresa Riley5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLaura Sullivan / Linda Lober vs Katie Kuehner / Jennifer Boyd6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesStaci Wittek / Adriana Hall vs Kelli Arenson / Elaine Page6-2, 6-0
2026-08-20vs PReimann/JJZhu (Park Road)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesRona Karacaova / Lesly Carlton vs Diane Hancock / Rhonda Tate6-1, 7-6
L#2 DoublesStaci Wittek / Diann Hickson vs Zahide Marenic / Kim Gissy3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesShannon Burke / Sarah Prochaska vs Kate MacRone / Lisa Morgan3-6, 0-6
2026-08-16vs KKuehner (Life Time)Split 11
L#1 DoublesRona Karacaova / Staci Wittek vs Teresa Riley / Julie Dailly6-1, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTina Bobrowski / Linda Lober vs Elizabeth Myers / Kelli Arenson5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2026-08-13vs CMiles (Queens)Won 21
L#1 DoublesJulie Ackerlund / Linda Lober vs Christine Miles / Loriann Summers6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesStaci Wittek / Karen Allen vs Sharon Smaston / Antoinette Tan6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLaura Sullivan / Tina Bobrowski vs Luz Lim / Maryann Whalen7-6, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings21 teams · 55 & Over Combo 6.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NMurphy (WSRC)3072665
2TBlankenship (PCC)3063869
3TRogovin (JCC)2163661
4EKyle/Ward (Firethorne)2163650
5RSmith/RCooper (Piper Glen)2163767
6LHatfield (Palisades)21541088
7PReimann/JJZhu (Park Road)1030014
8KKuehner (Life Time)1021433
9LSobodash/White (Pine Lake)1133656
10SPurdy (Charlotte Tennis)1133752
11MWhite (Carmel)1133761
12ACheek/KLoor (Jeff Adams)1133861
13SWittek (Raintree)1133853
14EGold (OPRC)12451186
15MDavis/CWilson (Southampton)12541186
16SMyers (Queens)0103636
17CMiles (Queens)02151069
18BLothe (Mason Wallace)02151066
19LCranford (Sardis)02061273
20JThaker (BCC)03361499
21SConnor (PCC)031817105

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Staci Wittek
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.05
Linda Lober
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.95
Lesly Carlton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.93
Rona Karacaova
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.82
Denise Dexter
published 3
2.79
Tina Bobrowski
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Adriana Hall
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Diann Hickson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
Julie Ackerlund
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Sarah Prochaska
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rona Karacaova + Staci Wittek4262% games+4.2% vs expected
Tina Bobrowski + Linda Lober123 matchesnot enough data
Lesly Carlton + Linda Lober303 matchesnot enough data
Staci Wittek + Denise Dexter303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Staci Wittek
99W–96L career · 5 lines in 2026
13%86%<1%
3.15
3.5
Linda Lober
66W–83L career · 3 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.05
Lesly Carlton
12W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
65%35%<1%
2.95
3
Rona Karacaova
51W–35L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Denise Dexter
9W–6L career · no lines in 2026
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Tina Bobrowski
16W–38L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Adriana Hall
16W–45L career · 1 line in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Diann Hickson
7W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
6%93%1%
2.71
3
Julie Ackerlund
44W–55L career · 2 lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
2.65
Sarah Prochaska
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.