Teams

SC 4.5-3.5 Men 40 & Over (Reese)

40 & Over Tri-Level · 40 & Over 4.5-3.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP 4.20 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-09-20vs GSTL40/Fedele/GrandeDunesWon 30
W#1 DoublesGlenn Reese / Charles Webb vs Daniel Francis / James Himsworth6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAdalberto Taguchi / Marc Verde vs Daniel Fedele / Terry Walden6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesChris Stier / Palmer Williams vs Kenneth Santiago / James Full6-1, 6-0
2025-09-20vs LCTA40/Strickland/MaybankLost 12
L#1 DoublesGlenn Reese / Andrew Jacob vs Ronald Orban / Doug MacKelcan6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMarc Verde / Adalberto Taguchi vs Matthew Hawkins / Jason Daigle3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesTim Kvam / Josh Burton vs Matt Fultz / John David Pfile7-6, 7-5
2025-09-19vs LCTA40/Strickland/MaybankLost 12
L#1 DoublesAndrew Jacob / Charles Webb vs Ronald Orban / Doug MacKelcan3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMarc Verde / Jenkins Mann vs James Taylor / Matthew Hawkins2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesChris Stier / Tim Kvam vs Matt Fultz / Scott Usher6-2, 6-2
2025-09-19vs GSTL40/Fedele/GrandeDunesWon 30
W#1 DoublesAndrew Jacob / Glenn Reese vs Daniel Francis / James Himsworth6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMarc Verde / David Weise vs Daniel Fedele / Terry Walden6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesChris Stier / Tim Kvam vs Kenneth Santiago / James Full6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over 4.5-3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.88 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.37
Charles Webb
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.32
Glenn Reese
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Andrew Jacob
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.00
Marc Verde
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.93
Chris Stier
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.93
David Weise
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
Jenkins Mann
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Adalberto Taguchi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.54
Palmer Williams
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Tim Kvam
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marc Verde + David Weise8165% games+0.9% vs expected
Glenn Reese + Andrew Jacob314 matchesnot enough data
Tim Kvam + Chris Stier404 matchesnot enough data
David Weise + Adalberto Taguchi303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Charles Webb
47W–30L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
4.37
Glenn Reese
12W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
4.32
4.5
Andrew Jacob
12W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Marc Verde
11W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
4.00
4
Chris Stier
36W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.93
4
David Weise
26W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.93
Jenkins Mann
65W–40L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Adalberto Taguchi
34W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Palmer Williams
36W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.54
Tim Kvam
82W–93L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.