Teams

LOZITO

2023 SOUTH EAST TENNIS ADULT 40 & OVER · MEN 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-05-23vs Warhaftig HTRCLost 01
L#3 DoublesBryan McCabe / Edwin Wagenseller vs Jeffrey Warhaftig / William Mabie3-6, 3-6
2023-05-02Lost 01
L#1 DoublesRobert Matthews / Bryan McCabe vs Jeffery Reiniche / Pete Cerra1-6, 3-6
2023-04-02vs Basta/Lanier CFCCWon 10
W#1 SinglesBryan McCabe vs Huntley Garriott7-5, 6-4
2023-03-26Won 10
W#1 SinglesBryan McCabe vs Chris Preston6-2, 7-5
2023-03-07vs O'Connor PNCCWon 10
W#1 DoublesRobert Matthews / Bryan McCabe vs Scott Rogers / John Schoolfield6-4, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Brendan Bastable
published 4
3.83
Cliff Sass
published 4
3.77
Bryan McCabe
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 4
3.69
Joshua Phanco
published
3.69
Ben Whitlock
published 4
3.67
Jeremy Lozito
published
3.64
Steve Peterson
published
3.63
Andrew Collins
published 4
3.58
Timothy Howard
published
3.56
Mike Voorheis
published
3.54
Han-Leong Goh
published
3.54
Edwin Wagenseller
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeremy Lozito + Steve Peterson2353% gamesnot enough data
Ben Whitlock + Mike Voorheis033 matchesnot enough data
Steve Peterson + Bryan McCabe303 matchesnot enough data
Brendan Bastable + Andrew Collins213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brendan Bastable
36W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%72%28%
3.92
4
Cliff Sass
15W–13L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.83
4
Bryan McCabe
224W–121L career · 5 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.77
Joshua Phanco
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Ben Whitlock
10W–9L career · no lines in 2023
9%89%1%
3.69
Jeremy Lozito
13W–13L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.67
Steve Peterson
16W–19L career · no lines in 2023
15%84%1%
3.64
4
Andrew Collins
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.63
Timothy Howard
8W–4L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.58
Mike Voorheis
10W–14L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.56
Han-Leong Goh
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.54
Edwin Wagenseller
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.54

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.