Teams

Apex:StraightSets:Straetz

2023 Fall Tri-Level · 3.5 Men

5 players · average NTRP 3.25 / MAINE

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-12-03vs Apex:BlassWon 10
W#1 DoublesJason Straetz / Andrew Gould vs Austen Blass / Vincent Edwards7-5, 6-2
2023-12-02vs Apex:PiccoloLost 01
L#1 DoublesAndrew Gould / Jason Straetz vs Gary Piccolo / Andrew Piccolo5-7, 4-6
2023-10-29vs Apex:PiccoloWon 10
W#1 DoublesSean Dundon / Nate Huber vs Gary Piccolo / Andrew Piccolo6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2023-10-29vs Acopi:HamelLost 01
L#1 DoublesNate Huber / Emanuele Porretto vs Yang Fan / Michael Hamel1-6, 3-6
2023-10-14vs Apex:Tri-Funk:ChadbourneLost 01
L#1 DoublesNate Huber / Emanuele Porretto vs Marc Chadbourne / Scott Hardy2-6, 1-6
2023-10-04vs Apex:BlassWon 10
W#1 DoublesAndrew Gould / Jason Straetz vs Austen Blass / Vincent Edwards6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2023-10-01vs Apex:Tri-Funk:ChadbourneLost 01
L#1 DoublesAndrew Gould / Emanuele Porretto vs John Cannon / Scott Hardy5-7, 1-6
2023-09-17vs Apex:KroondykLost 01
L#1 DoublesJason Straetz / Emanuele Porretto vs Dave Kroondyk / Andy Schachter3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 3.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Apex:Kroondyk7272765
2Acopi:Hamel6363663
3Apex:Tri-Funk:Chadbourne55551179
4Apex:Piccolo555513102
5Apex:StraightSets:Straetz35351289
6Apex:Blass282817118

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Andrew Gould
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Jason Straetz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Sean Dundon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Emanuele Porretto
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Nate Huber
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrew Gould + Jason Straetz314 matchesnot enough data
Nate Huber + Emanuele Porretto033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Andrew Gould
65W–41L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
3.36
Jason Straetz
27W–19L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%95%2%
3.25
Sean Dundon
61W–57L career · 1 line in 2023
8%91%1%
3.18
3
Emanuele Porretto
7W–12L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%9%91%
3.17
Nate Huber
12W–29L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.