Teams

(A3) Lakewood/Motes W4.0

2022 DTA 40 & Over ADULT W Friday · W4.0

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for W4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.37
Danielle Heston
published 4.5
Anna Cardenas
published 4
3.71
Maria Hasbany
published
3.59
Kasey Colvin
published
3.57
Stephanie Burgard
published
2.98
Ginny Leone
published 3.5
2.90
Mae Reeves
published
Karen Motes
published
Kari Hernandez
published
Kate White
published
Kristi Bare
published
Michelle Early
published
Sally Stephenson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Motes + Elizabeth Lamberson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Danielle Heston
13W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
4.37
4
Anna Cardenas
1W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Elizabeth Lamberson
3W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Maria Hasbany
17W–5L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.71
Kasey Colvin
13W–14L career · no lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.59
Stephanie Burgard
18W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%29%71%
3.57
3.5
Ginny Leone
0W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2022
55%45%<1%
2.98
Mae Reeves
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
78%22%<1%
2.90
Karen Motes
6W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kari Hernandez
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kate White
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kristi Bare
0W–13L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Michelle Early
6W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sally Stephenson
2W–14L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.