Teams

SDNC 4.0 Fairbanks(3:1)/ Hansen

2025 Adult 40 & Over Winter- SDNC WE · SDNC - Men - 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-03-16vs SDNC 4.0 BTP (2:2)/ QuintalLost 01
L#2 DoublesJason Graves / Matthew Dart vs Jeff Bernard / Scott Quintal4-6, 4-6
2025-03-09vs SDNC 4.0 RPTC(2:2)/ YeemWon 10
W#2 DoublesJason Graves / Matthew Dart vs Michael Donahue / Wilson Yongkap Yeem6-4, 6-1
2025-03-02vs SDNC 4.0 RBCTC(3:1)/ MoureyWon 10
W#2 DoublesJason Graves / Matthew Dart vs Ronald Mourey / Andrew Chiu6-1, 7-5
2025-02-16vs SDNC 4.0 RDO(3:1)/ TiltonWon 10
W#3 DoublesMatthew Dart / Scott Hansen vs Jason Lane / Byrton Slack6-2, 6-1
2025-02-02vs SDNC 4.0 Lomas (3:1)/ MunceWon 10
W#2 DoublesJason Graves / Matthew Dart vs Wolfram Worms / Keith Greener7-6, 6-1
2025-01-19vs SDNC 4.0 La Valle(2:2)/ ManheimLost 01
L#3 DoublesMatthew Dart / Blake Foster vs Jerry Storvold / Charles Rogers4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-01-12vs SDNC 4.0 La Costa(3:1)/ FlahertyWon 10
W#3 DoublesMatthew Dart / Blake Foster vs Dean Stiger / Stephen Nicol6-3, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - Men - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Matthew Dart
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.83
Rich Cerruti
published
3.81
Mike Sartwell
published
3.75
Jason Graves
published
3.73
Nicholas Palmer
published
3.71
John Jastremski
published
3.61
Marcus Serrano
published
3.58
James Nideffer
published 4
3.51
Jimmy Atri
published
3.51
Robert Lozano
published
3.50
Blake Foster
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jason Graves + Marcus Serrano224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Matthew Dart
42W–26L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.89
Rich Cerruti
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.83
Mike Sartwell
10W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.81
Jason Graves
3W–8L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
Nicholas Palmer
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
John Jastremski
7W–1L career · no lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.71
Marcus Serrano
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.61
4
James Nideffer
8W–7L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.58
Jimmy Atri
4W–0L career · no lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.51
Robert Lozano
1W–11L career · no lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.51
4
Blake Foster
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.50

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.