Teams

SConnor (Providence County Club)

2023 Combo Doubles 55 & Over League · 55 & Over 6.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 2.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-10-02vs CThilo (Pine Lake)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJan Aspey / Rebecca Shore vs Susan Brightwell / Jan Puckett4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSally Connor / Laura Hendler vs Dottie Boone / Gayle Hoy1-6, 1-6
2023-09-25vs SMyers (PPRSC)Split 11
L#1 DoublesPam Richardson / Jan Aspey vs Kristen Deskevich / Pat Williams6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSally Connor / Barbara van Meerten vs Sheryl Smith / Susan Grills6-2, 7-6
2023-09-18vs TAmos/TLoughlin-Young (WSRC)Split 11
W#1 DoublesPam Richardson / Lisa Duggins vs Celia Stallings / Tracy Amos7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLori Ash / Jan Aspey vs Jane Neese / Gayle Gold2-6, 0-6
2023-09-11vs HGores/JNomina (OPRC)Split 11
L#1 DoublesPam Richardson / Jan Aspey vs Jean Sanderson / Elizabeth Neligan1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSally Connor / Patricia Beatty vs Hilda Gores / Antoinette Faccone6-3, 7-5
2023-08-28vs JLayne/NChristensen (Southampton)Won 10
W#1 DoublesPam Richardson / Lisa Duggins vs Cindy Wilson / Teri Iezzi6-4, 6-4
2023-08-21vs JSlep (Charlotte Indoor)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesJan Aspey / Lisa Duggins vs Kate Blankenship / Gillian Murrell4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesSally Connor / Rebecca Conley vs Margaret Hiller / Patty Kahle0-6, 1-6
2023-08-14vs CThilo (Pine Lake)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesPam Richardson / Lisa Duggins vs Susan Brightwell / Lori Jones6-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.55 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.95
Pam Richardson
published
2.77
Lisa Duggins
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.62
Jan Aspey
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.47
Sally Connor
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.41
Patricia Beatty
published
2.40
Judi Affeldt
published
2.25
Barbara van Meerten
published 2.5
Kay Porter
published
Lori Ash
published
Mimi Carbone
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sally Connor + Jan Aspey044 matchesnot enough data
Jan Aspey + Lisa Duggins134 matchesnot enough data
Sally Connor + Lisa Duggins033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Pam Richardson
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
64%36%<1%
2.95
3
Lisa Duggins
17W–35L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%92%5%
2.77
3
Jan Aspey
22W–71L career · 5 lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
2.62
3
Sally Connor
20W–46L career · 4 lines in 2023
59%41%<1%
2.47
Patricia Beatty
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
74%26%<1%
2.41
Judi Affeldt
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
76%24%<1%
2.40
2.5
Barbara van Meerten
1W–7L career · no lines in 2023
0%96%4%
2.25
Kay Porter
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lori Ash
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mimi Carbone
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.