Teams

Ewing/Memphis

2025 Adult 18 & Over Early Start League - Memphis · 3.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-11-19vs Campbell/MemphisLost 04
L#1 DoublesAmi Tasker / Tanya Myers vs Catherine Owen / Abby Spann2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesStefenie Block vs Adrienne Herbek0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLeigh Ann Howell / Lauren Barnett vs Jill Campbell / Dorothy Work3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesHollie Marszalek vs Cait Shirilla1-6, 2-6
2024-11-14vs Edwards/MemphisLost 12
L#2 DoublesAndrea Harano / Lauren Barnett vs Sophie Edwards / Melody Greene1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesHallie Bauer vs Melanie Schrank2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAmi Tasker / Tanya Myers vs Chancey Thompson / Kelly Irvine6-4, 6-1
2024-10-28vs Savage/MemphisLost 23
W#1 DoublesHeidi Wharton / Taylor Bender vs Jenny Ezzell / Melissa Buchanan6-0, 6-0
L#1 SinglesDebbie Churchey vs Rebecca Stine2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAllison Ewing / Andrea Harano vs Molly Beard / Sarah Spinosa7-6, 6-2
L#2 SinglesHollie Marszalek vs Julie Little1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesHallie Bauer / Stefenie Block vs Shanleigh Walton / FELICIA HAUSER2-6, 6-7
2024-10-16vs Turner/MemphisWon 41
W#1 DoublesMichele Thomas / Gaby Orta vs Natalie Hartman / Frannie Franks6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesDebbie Churchey vs Callie Mejia6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesStefenie Block / Tonya Logan vs Jenay Boggs / Lexis Zellner6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesHallie Bauer vs Mary Marshall Fenton6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAndrea Harano / Hollie Marszalek vs Morgan Ray / Karen Weissinger4-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Taylor Bender
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.38
Heidi Wharton
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
3.06
Debbie Churchey
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.92
Tanya Myers
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.89
Ami Tasker
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.78
Stefenie Block
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
Andrea Harano
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.72
Leigh Ann Howell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Gaby Orta
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.60
Hallie Bauer
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.53
Hollie Marszalek
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Lauren Barnett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Tonya Logan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heidi Wharton + Taylor Bender17264% games+16.6% vs expected
Tanya Myers + Ami Tasker211454% games+6.0% vs expected
Stefenie Block + Gaby Orta2348% gamesnot enough data
Stefenie Block + Hallie Bauer033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Taylor Bender
27W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.46
Heidi Wharton
29W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
3
Debbie Churchey
31W–29L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.06
Tanya Myers
24W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.92
3
Ami Tasker
27W–20L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.89
Stefenie Block
18W–40L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Andrea Harano
4W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Leigh Ann Howell
3W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Gaby Orta
11W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
Hallie Bauer
9W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
2.60
Hollie Marszalek
13W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
2.53
Lauren Barnett
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tonya Logan
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.