Teams

MLBJordan-Wilkes/Westport

2022 18 & Over Mixed Doubles · Mixed 7.0 Tues pm 18s

10 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-08-08vs MLKGrathwohl=Noyes/RRWon 20
W#1 DoublesEdward Levy / Kim Beazlie vs Kelly Grathwohl / Jacob Grathwohl7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesNicole Cochran / Brian Stiffler vs Amy Ward / Charles Utz6-1, 1-6, 1-0
2022-07-31vs M-LKBurdick/NMPWon 10
W#1 DoublesKathleen Stiffler / Brian Stiffler vs Michael Clark / ERIN CLARK6-2, 6-4
2022-07-26vs MLJDavis/JettonLost 02
L#1 DoublesTanner Jordan / Justin Wilkes vs Cynthia Delay / William Wingo4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKathleen Stiffler / Brian Stiffler vs George McRorie / Nicole Biffle4-6, 0-6
2022-06-21vs MLCORR-CSD-Split 11
L#1 DoublesJason Wilkes / Tanner Jordan vs Alex Orr / Sydney Williams0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesBrian Stiffler / Nicole Cochran vs Wes Williams / Kristen Rogers6-2, 6-4
2022-06-14vs M-LKScher/NMP 7.0 team Tues pmWon 21
W#1 DoublesJim Cochran / Kathleen Stiffler vs Scott Hudson / Jana Ritter6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNicole Cochran / Brian Stiffler vs Annie Edenfield / David Matheny5-7, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJustin Wilkes / Tanner Jordan vs Kaylin Scher / Hunter Noldin5-7, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mixed 7.0 Tues pm 18s have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.07
Brenda Levy
published 4.5
3.82
Nathalie Naslund
published 4
3.51
Jim Cochran
published
3.48
Brian Stiffler
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.33
Tanner Jordan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Patricia Ferguson
published
3.07
Edward Levy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.00
Kathleen Stiffler
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.97
Nicole Cochran
published
Kim Beazlie
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brian Stiffler + Kathleen Stiffler151153% games+10.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brenda Levy
4W–9L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
4.07
4
Nathalie Naslund
86W–54L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.82
Jim Cochran
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
47%53%<1%
3.51
3.5
Brian Stiffler
88W–59L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%55%44%
3.48
3.5
Tanner Jordan
53W–42L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%89%10%
3.33
Patricia Ferguson
11W–17L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Edward Levy
139W–135L career · 1 line in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.07
3.5
Kathleen Stiffler
152W–161L career · 3 lines in 2022
51%49%<1%
3.00
Nicole Cochran
5W–12L career · no lines in 2022
58%42%<1%
2.97
Kim Beazlie
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.