Teams

UPTA55A/McPhail/Riverside

2025 UPTA Adult 55 & Over - USTA · 55 Adult Women - 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-04-09vs UPTA55A/Tuttle/PavilionWon 21
L#1 DoublesLiz Darrow / Suzanne Spotts vs Jeannie Roberts / Lauren Valuckas1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesEdie Clator / Justine Allen vs Jennifer Tuttle / Jill Curran6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCatherine Hunt / Peggy O'Reagan vs Sharon Payne / Yanxia Zhao6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2025-03-12vs UPTA55A/Hendricks/KrocWon 30
W#1 DoublesLiz Darrow / Elizabeth McCollum vs Sheila Reitler / Kathleen Ryan6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCatherine Hunt / Suzanne Spotts vs Jill Wolf / Francine Holmes7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCarol McCoy / Peggy O'Reagan vs Lyn Boyd / Sarah Hendricks6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 Adult Women - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Elizabeth McCollum
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Edie Clator
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Liz Darrow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Catherine Hunt
published 3.5
3.19
Justine Allen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Robbie McPhail
published
3.07
Nancy McEachern
published
3.07
Barbara Durk
published 3.5
3.05
Carol McCoy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.00
Suzanne Spotts
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Peggy O'Reagan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Liz Darrow + Suzanne Spotts2450% games+7.5% vs expected
Peggy O'Reagan + Carol McCoy5253% games−0.2% vs expected
Justine Allen + Edie Clator7354% games−6.3% vs expected
Liz Darrow + Edie Clator3262% gamesnot enough data
Edie Clator + Elizabeth McCollum404 matchesnot enough data
Robbie McPhail + Barbara Durk303 matchesnot enough data
Barbara Durk + Carol McCoy123 matchesnot enough data
Liz Darrow + Catherine Hunt303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elizabeth McCollum
51W–34L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.46
Edie Clator
42W–27L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.42
Liz Darrow
28W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Catherine Hunt
8W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Justine Allen
26W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Robbie McPhail
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.14
Nancy McEachern
24W–47L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07
3.5
Barbara Durk
6W–13L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.07
3.5
Carol McCoy
9W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.05
Suzanne Spotts
38W–30L career · 2 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.00
Peggy O'Reagan
7W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.