← Teams

Hawk 6.0 Mixed

2021 Frederick County Mixed 18 & Over · Frederick County Mixed 18 & Over 6.0

7 players · average NTRP 3.40 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-02-28vs Cady's Mixed 6.0Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesRebecca DeGioia / David Price vs Carol Bernard / Sam Hoffpauir6-0, 6-1
2021-02-27vs Cady's Mixed 6.0Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesRebecca DeGioia / David Price vs Traci Bidinger / Chad King6-1, 6-3
2021-02-25vs JONESLost 0–1
L#1 DoublesScott Alban / Stephanie Heinrichs vs Andrew Brammer / Millette Miller2-6, 3-6
2021-02-21vs Cady's Mixed 6.0Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesRebecca DeGioia / Scott Alban vs Chad King / Traci Bidinger6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesStephanie Heinrichs / MATTHEW HEINRICHS vs Fouad Abbas / Michele Hansen6-0, 6-3
2021-02-15vs Cady's Mixed 6.0Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesRebecca DeGioia / Scott Alban vs Sam Hoffpauir / Stacie King6-1, 6-0
2021-01-24vs Cady's Mixed 6.0Split 1–1
L#2 DoublesCraig Gordon / Rebecca DeGioia vs Russell Acosta / Traci Bidinger0-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMATTHEW HEINRICHS / Stacey Donaldson vs Chad King / Steffie Cannella Beck6-2, 6-3
2021-01-13Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesRebecca DeGioia / Robert Bongiorno vs Julie Baker / John Back6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2021-01-07vs JONESLost 0–1
L#1 DoublesNick Damoulakis / Stephanie Heinrichs vs Michael Simonds / Donna Jones3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-01-05Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesMATTHEW HEINRICHS / Stephanie Heinrichs vs Fouad Abbas / Michele Hansen6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Frederick County Mixed 18 & Over 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Bill Hartman
published 3.5
3.30
Bridgett Patterson
published 3.5
3.24
MATTHEW HEINRICHS
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.00
Rebecca DeGioia
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
2.88
Stephanie Heinrichs
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.88
Kimberly Price
published —
—
Martin Hawk
published —
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Heinrichs + MATTHEW HEINRICHS26–2153% games−0.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bill Hartman
35W–18L career · no lines in 2021
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Bridgett Patterson
2W–5L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
MATTHEW HEINRICHS
87W–74L career · 3 lines in 2021
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Rebecca DeGioia
124W–169L career · 10 lines in 2021
50%50%<1%
3.00
3
Stephanie Heinrichs
107W–115L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%81%19%
2.88
—
Kimberly Price
0W–7L career · no lines in 2021
<1%82%18%
2.88
—
Martin Hawk
0W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.