Teams

Team 5 Net Stalkers

2025 NOVA Adult 55 & Over · NOVA Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.94 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-08-11vs Team 3 Midcourt CrisisWon 10
W#2 DoublesBeth Ector / Nancy Colleton vs Mary Hope / Leigh Wilson6-2, 6-4
2025-08-03vs Team 4 Acing GracefullyWon 10
W#3 DoublesTeresa Nyberg-Grim / Anne Ward vs Cheryl Hughes / Michelle Stas6-0, 7-5
2025-07-28vs Team 2 DOWNTON ALLEY at nightSplit 11
W#1 DoublesNancy Colleton / Beth Ector vs Kim Miller / Laura Sachwitz7-5, 3-1
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Law / Teresa Nyberg-Grim vs Teri Fahlgren / Jenelle Langen4-6, 1-6
2025-07-16vs Team 1 Night SetsWon 10
W#2 DoublesTeresa Nyberg-Grim / Elizabeth Law vs Cheryl Danner / Noriko Hoffman7-6, 2-0
2025-07-08vs Team 2 DOWNTON ALLEY at nightLost 12
L#1 DoublesRobin Burton / Beth Sepulveda vs Kim Miller / Laura Sachwitz0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesBeth Ector / Amy Newman vs Jennifer Snyder / Caroline Mia Lee6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAlexei Haughom / Beth Hill vs Aileen Jones / Laurie Heuple6-7, 3-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Ann Grubbs
published 4.5
4.17
Alexei Haughom
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.16
Loretta Sevier
published
4.04
Teresa Nyberg-Grim
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.89
Nancy Colleton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.73
Beth Ector
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Robin Burton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Wendy Hahn
published
3.31
Alice Edmondson
published 3.5
3.31
Anne Ward
published 3.5
Beth Sepulveda
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Elizabeth Law
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Lauren Rowley
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Ann Grubbs
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Alexei Haughom
4W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
4.17
Loretta Sevier
20W–10L career · no lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
4.16
4.5
Teresa Nyberg-Grim
87W–61L career · 3 lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
4.04
4
Nancy Colleton
33W–37L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.89
4
Beth Ector
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
Robin Burton
8W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
5%93%1%
3.71
Wendy Hahn
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.52
3.5
Alice Edmondson
22W–21L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Anne Ward
19W–14L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Beth Sepulveda
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Elizabeth Law
3W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.09
Lauren Rowley
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.