Teams

KMacrone/BDavis (Park Road)

2022 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 3.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.10 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-04-28vs KLee/SChandra (Charlotte Indoor)Split 11
W#2 DoublesGladys Shinmoto / Qing Yang vs Sarah Varner / Lauren Baynham6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKate MacRone / Barbara Davis vs Katie Archer / Shruti Chandra2-6, 2-6
2022-04-21vs SRock/HFranc (Piper Glen)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesGladys Shinmoto vs Kathy Harborne1-6, 6-7
2022-04-07vs LPalmer (Raintree)Won 10
W#3 DoublesKate MacRone / Heidy Bartell vs Rebecca Plaisance / Heather Hiltzik7-6, 6-1
2022-03-31vs LCulp/SDeVries (Queens)Split 11
W#2 SinglesGladys Shinmoto vs Stacey Valitchka6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKate MacRone / Heidy Bartell vs Anna Hickey / Anne Morgan3-6, 1-6
2022-03-24vs BBaker (Queens)Won 10
W#3 DoublesGladys Shinmoto / Heidy Bartell vs Alana Carlton / Allison Purmort7-5, 6-1
2022-03-10vs NKosel/SChandler (Raintree)Won 10
W#3 DoublesHeidy Bartell / Gladys Shinmoto vs Kelly Thompson / Adriana Hall6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2022-03-03vs KLee/SChandra (Charlotte Indoor)Split 11
W#2 DoublesQing Yang / Gladys Shinmoto vs Lauren Olson / Jodi VonEschen6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesBarbara Davis / Kate MacRone vs Sarah Varner / Katie Archer7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2022-02-24vs SRock/HFranc (Piper Glen)Won 10
W#3 DoublesKate MacRone / Barbara Davis vs Jenny Wilken / Sarah Garner1-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Marissa Kleber
published
3.54
Laura Grant
published
3.45
Elizabeth Kennard
published 3.5
3.05
Mary Gross
published
3.01
Gladys Shinmoto
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.80
Kate MacRone
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Barbara Davis
published 3
2.66
Katherine Winfrey
published
2.46
Heidy Bartell
published 3
Karen Summers
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Grant + Marissa Kleber2451% gamesnot enough data
Elizabeth Kennard + Barbara Davis3255% gamesnot enough data
Gladys Shinmoto + Kate MacRone314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marissa Kleber
14W–15L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.69
Laura Grant
36W–18L career · no lines in 2022
<1%39%61%
3.54
3.5
Elizabeth Kennard
27W–18L career · no lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
3.45
Mary Gross
19W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%34%66%
3.05
3
Gladys Shinmoto
100W–119L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%47%53%
3.01
3
Kate MacRone
77W–124L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Barbara Davis
23W–40L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
2.69
Katherine Winfrey
2W–13L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
2.66
3
Heidy Bartell
13W–15L career · no lines in 2022
64%36%<1%
2.46
Karen Summers
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.