Teams

GR-Taylor 40s 4.0M SP

2025 Neuse River Adult 40 & Over League · 4.0 Men 40 & over

9 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-30vs BW- Toler 40s 4.0M SPWon 20
W#1 DoublesRobert Taylor / Jonathan Tribula vs Will Mayo / Jay Wilkins6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJeremy Jones / TJ Thomas vs Andy Monshaw / Andy Varnell6-0, 6-1
2025-04-12vs BW- Toler 40s 4.0M SPLost 02
L#1 DoublesJeff Gravelin / Robert Jones vs Bill Anderson / Graham Toler3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesBrian Ellis / Kenneth Kornegay vs John Turner / Andy Varnell6-7, 3-6
2025-04-03vs BW- Toler 40s 4.0M SPWon 20
W#1 DoublesJeremy Jones / Corey Fader vs Bill Anderson / Jonathan Taylor6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJeff Gravelin / Robert Jones vs Gregory Rogers / Mark Gerhart7-5, 7-6
2025-03-29vs BW- Toler 40s 4.0M SPLost 02
L#1 DoublesTJ Thomas / Jonathan Tribula vs Graham Toler / Andy Varnell5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesRobert Jones / Brandon Sutton vs Mark Gerhart / John Turner3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-03-22vs BW- Toler 40s 4.0M SPSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAlberto Gonzales / Jeff Gravelin vs Graham Toler / Rick Martin1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKenneth Kornegay / Matt Turbeville vs Will Mayo / Gregory Rogers6-4, 6-3
2025-03-08vs BW- Toler 40s 4.0M SPLost 03
L#1 DoublesJeremy Jones / Alberto Gonzales vs Graham Toler / Andy Varnell6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBrian Ellis / Kenneth Kornegay vs Mark Gerhart / Andrew Shue4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCorey Fader / Jeff Gravelin vs Jonathan Taylor / Bill Anderson1-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men 40 & over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Brian Ellis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Corey Fader
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.65
Jonathan Tribula
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Matt Turbeville
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
TJ Thomas
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.39
Alberto Gonzales
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Jeff Gravelin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.14
Brandon Sutton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Kenneth Kornegay
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brian Ellis
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Corey Fader
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jonathan Tribula
7W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
13%86%<1%
3.65
Matt Turbeville
6W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
16%84%<1%
3.63
TJ Thomas
14W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.62
3.5
Alberto Gonzales
11W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.39
Jeff Gravelin
21W–21L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Brandon Sutton
7W–14L career · 6 lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
3.14
Kenneth Kornegay
6W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.