Teams

SPTC Holliday 8.0 MXD

2025 Pinellas Mixed 40 & Over Winter · 8.0 MXD

12 players · average NTRP 3.75 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-03-16vs Tarpon KronkLost 01
L#1 DoublesGeoffrey Jones / Kenzier McIntyre vs Laura DeHaan / Erik Breitenbach1-6, 1-6
2025-02-16vs McMullen FramersWon 10
W#1 DoublesGeoffrey Jones / Kenzier McIntyre vs Daniel Cribb / Lita Hollister6-4, 6-3
2025-02-02vs Tarpon KronkWon 10
W#1 DoublesGeoffrey Jones / Kenzier McIntyre vs Erik Breitenbach / Melissa Sheridan3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-01-26vs Pinellas/Abrams/40&Over8.0XWon 10
W#3 DoublesGeoffrey Jones / Kenzier McIntyre vs Albert Alhadeff / Susan Fearnow6-2, 6-3
2025-01-12vs McMullen Tough NutsWon 10
W#1 DoublesGeoffrey Jones / Kenzier McIntyre vs Diana Zarreke / Michael Dionne7-6, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 MXD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.15
Geoffrey Jones
published
3.87
Klodiana Shehi
published
3.86
Ernie Pabon
published
Aja Sterling
published 4
3.56
Kenzier McIntyre
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.52
Nafari Morris
published
3.28
Lawrence Allen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Eugene Holliday
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jermaine Flowers
published
Michael Rocke
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Peter Holtmann
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Rob Perry
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Klodiana Shehi + Ernie Pabon5447% games−1.2% vs expected
Geoffrey Jones + Kenzier McIntyre2456% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Geoffrey Jones
5W–11L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
4.15
Klodiana Shehi
13W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.87
Ernie Pabon
15W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.86
4
Aja Sterling
no matches on record · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Kenzier McIntyre
173W–119L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.56
Nafari Morris
11W–13L career · no lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.52
Lawrence Allen
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Eugene Holliday
7W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jermaine Flowers
10W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Rocke
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Peter Holtmann
3W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Rob Perry
4W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.