Teams

NJ GREEN

2026 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-05-26vs RHCC NAVYWon 40
W#1 DoublesVishwa Seneviratne / Bryan Dahler vs Stephen Komon / Lee Tsuo6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTyler Roberts / Robert Hempelman vs Alec Rossano / Charles Lucas6-4, 6-3
W#2 SinglesJim Trevor vs Corey Crawford6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJohn Hartney / Scott Nguyen vs Michael Anderson / Paul Kos6-3, 6-0
2026-05-19vs NJ BLUELost 13
L#1 DoublesCarper Davis / Scott Nguyen vs Scott Laux / Kevin Thistle4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesGregg Occhiogrosso vs Kyle Brown2-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesRobert Hempelman / Mark Kiker vs Brad Nash / David Lane6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesBryan Dahler / Brian Messer vs Ernest Reece / JoJo Brotamonte2-6, 4-6
2026-05-18vs LTC-D REDLost 23
L#1 DoublesJames Burton / Robert Hempelman vs Leighton Johnson / Ankit Verma2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesGregg Occhiogrosso vs Matthew Andrade2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesTyler Roberts / Mark Kiker vs Jimmy Dilz / Michael Perenich6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJim Trevor vs Sebastian Moore7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesVishwa Seneviratne / Carper Davis vs Cole Bloom / Edward Bueche4-6, 1-6
2026-05-12vs MC NAVYLost 14
L#1 DoublesVishwa Seneviratne / Scott Nguyen vs Chris Driscoll / Jeremy Kossler3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesJim Trevor vs Brad Arnold6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJohn Hartney / Tyler Roberts vs Thomas Crane / Lee Davis2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 SinglesGregg Occhiogrosso vs Joe Nowak3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMark Kiker / Bryan Dahler vs Charles Sprague / Blair Eklund1-6, 4-6
2026-04-28vs MC REDWon 50
W#1 DoublesScott Nguyen / John Hartney vs Michael Dill / Mark Phillips6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesGregg Occhiogrosso vs Nate Skinner6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMark Kiker / Carper Davis vs Claude Murray / Brian Fletcher6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesJames Burton vs Nathan Knepper6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBrian Messer / Bryan Dahler vs Jim Greiner / Jason Brown3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-04-21vs RHCC NAVYSplit 22
L#1 DoublesTyler Roberts / John Hartney vs Corey Crawford / Paul Grumann4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesGregg Occhiogrosso vs Michael Anderson6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesVishwa Seneviratne / Brian Messer vs Jon McVey / Stephen Komon6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRobert Hempelman / Mark Kiker vs Alec Rossano / Paul Kos6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2026-04-14vs NJ BLUEWon 40
W#1 DoublesTyler Roberts / Mark Kiker vs Robert Dallenbach / Scott Sweeney6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJim Trevor vs Scott Laux6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesScott Nguyen / Vishwa Seneviratne vs Ernest Reece / JoJo Brotamonte7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCarper Davis / Robert Hempelman vs Tom Merkert / Paul Angelino6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Jim Trevor
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.48
Tyler Roberts
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.46
Robert Hempelman
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.33
Carper Davis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.31
Gregg Occhiogrosso
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.30
John Hartney
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.28
Vishwa Seneviratne
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.25
James Burton
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.18
Brian Messer
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Bryan Dahler
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.97
Mark Kiker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 0
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carper Davis + Robert Hempelman6262% games+7.0% vs expected
Brian Messer + Bryan Dahler123 matchesnot enough data
Vishwa Seneviratne + Bryan Dahler213 matchesnot enough data
Robert Hempelman + Mark Kiker303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jim Trevor
6W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%14%86%
3.64
3.5
Tyler Roberts
81W–17L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
3.48
3.5
Robert Hempelman
75W–33L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.46
3.5
Carper Davis
62W–44L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Gregg Occhiogrosso
34W–18L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
John Hartney
98W–29L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Vishwa Seneviratne
98W–53L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
James Burton
21W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Brian Messer
40W–50L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Bryan Dahler
30W–46L career · 4 lines in 2026
16%84%<1%
3.13
0
Mark Kiker
35W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
59%41%<1%
2.97

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.