← Teams

SHC-Welter

2022 Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 3.35 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Andrea Findley
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.52
Gregory Hobi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.44
Andrea Hobi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Roger Dehoog
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Jeff Welter
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.09
Scott Mayer
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.02
Ken Pacioni
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.89
Mike Baker
published 3
2.87
Amy Thomas
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
—
Jeffrey Metke
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
—
Jeffrey Fuchs
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 0
Results8 ties
2022-03-19Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesRoger Dehoog / Rhonda Baker vs Joy Meyers / Frank Mathews6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLisa Mayer / Scott Mayer vs Holly Kanz / Jered Cuenco6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRobin Welter / Jeff Welter vs Kristen Caldwell / Scott Pennington6-3, 7-5
2022-03-11Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesAndrea Hobi / Gregory Hobi vs Rosie Francis / NANDA SIDDAIAH6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAmy Thomas / Jeffrey Metke vs Cheri Martes Davis / Edmund Yuan6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLillian Lee / Ken Pacioni vs Andrea Vicino / Craig Putnam6-0, 6-1
2022-03-05Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesAndrea Hobi / Gregory Hobi vs Melanie Morris / Michael Delanty5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAndrea Findley / Jeffrey Fuchs vs Barbara Gram / John Oh6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLillian Lee / Ken Pacioni vs Elizabeth Burns / Jeff Cronn7-5, 6-4
2022-02-27Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesAndrea Hobi / Gregory Hobi vs David Hoiland / Jayne Mitchell6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Mayer / Scott Mayer vs Jane Pinkowski / Jeff Anhaltzer5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRobin Welter / Jeff Welter vs Alena Lauritsen / Richard Anderson6-3, 6-4
2022-02-06Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesRobin Welter / Roger Dehoog vs Ray Baxter / Erin Smiley6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLisa Mayer / Scott Mayer vs Cheryl Geisler / David Smiley2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTeresa Metke / Jeffrey Metke vs Donna Baxter / Barrry Weyhrauch6-2, 6-4
2022-01-30Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesAmy Thomas / Jeff Welter vs Lauren Larsen / Nate Larsen6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLisa Mayer / Jeffrey Metke vs Michele Sutherland / William Allers6-4, 6-1
2022-01-23Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesAndrea Hobi / Gregory Hobi vs Nora Semonsen / Kevin Semonsen6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRobin Welter / Jeff Welter vs Frederique Lavios / John St Claire6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLillian Lee / Ken Pacioni vs Natasha Rinard / Michael Lavios6-2, 6-2
2022-01-08Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesElicia Putnam / Roger Dehoog vs William Hertford / Tina Prassas6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAndrea Findley / Jeffrey Fuchs vs Frank Foti / Laura Maginnis5-2
L#3 DoublesAmy Thomas / Scott Mayer vs Emily Qi / Tony Humpage6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Andrea Findley
95W–44L career
0%91%9%
3.92
3.5
Gregory Hobi
38W–30L career
0%77%23%
3.52
3.5
Andrea Hobi
63W–46L career
0%92%8%
3.44
3.5
Roger Dehoog
5W–43L career · type M
4%94%2%
3.25
3.5
Jeff Welter
77W–46L career
11%89%0%
3.13
3
Scott Mayer
70W–71L career · type A
0%55%45%
3.09
3.5
Ken Pacioni
17W–29L career
32%68%0%
3.02
3
Mike Baker
47W–91L career
0%96%4%
2.89
3
Amy Thomas
27W–46L career
1%89%10%
2.87
3
Jeffrey Metke
21W–35L career
not enough data
—
0
Jeffrey Fuchs
19W–18L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.