Teams

Trigg, Anita

2026 Combo 55 & Over-JXN · Women 6.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.25 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Anna Dotson
published 3.5
3.54
Meg Maulding
published
3.40
Deborah McGehee
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Jan Woodson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.26
Iona Remulta
published 3
3.02
Angela Yeatts
published 3.5
3.01
Polly Moon
published
2.98
Cheryl Sykes
published 3
2.85
Jonna Farr
published
2.84
Jennie Mullen
published
2.78
Anita Trigg
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennie Mullen + Polly Moon4165% games+18.1% vs expected
Jennie Mullen + Iona Remulta6072% games+18.0% vs expected
Iona Remulta + Jonna Farr5170% games+12.3% vs expected
Anita Trigg + Polly Moon9260% games+11.0% vs expected
Deborah McGehee + Jan Woodson231952% games+6.9% vs expected
Deborah McGehee + Anna Dotson3257% gamesnot enough data
Polly Moon + Anna Dotson224 matchesnot enough data
Meg Maulding + Iona Remulta303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Anna Dotson
89W–74L career · no lines in 2026
<1%21%79%
3.60
Meg Maulding
50W–21L career · no lines in 2026
<1%38%62%
3.54
3.5
Deborah McGehee
117W–81L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.40
Jan Woodson
70W–56L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.31
3
Iona Remulta
73W–17L career · no lines in 2026
<1%2%98%
3.26
3.5
Angela Yeatts
28W–24L career · no lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
3.02
Polly Moon
70W–48L career · no lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.01
3
Cheryl Sykes
51W–38L career · type A · no lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
2.98
Jonna Farr
18W–17L career · no lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
2.85
Jennie Mullen
63W–67L career · no lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
2.84
3
Anita Trigg
59W–58L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.78

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.