Teams

Enk/18s/3.5/PAC Day

2025 Man · Cov Adult 18 & Over - Women Day

16 players · average NTRP 3.33 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Cov Adult 18 & Over - Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Alecia Seastrunk
usually #2 Doubles 64%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
3.35
Jessica Tufaro
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.32
Amber Mata
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
3.05
Ana Perdigao
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Jeanne Woodrick
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 39% · published
Kacey Zillner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lauren Ortis
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
Leslie Ricalde
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Mary Toce
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
Merritt Edwards
usually #3 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published
Pamela Owen
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published
Regina Knight
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #3 Doubles 28% · published
Ronda Walters
usually #2 Doubles 65%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Shannon Enk
usually #2 Doubles 51%, also #1 Doubles 26% · published
Stephanie Songy
usually #2 Doubles 48%, also #1 Doubles 24% · published
Witney Arch
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ronda Walters + Shannon Enk8555% gamesnot enough data
Merritt Edwards + Shannon Enk4355% gamesnot enough data
Kacey Zillner + Mary Toce6065% gamesnot enough data
Regina Knight + Merritt Edwards1440% gamesnot enough data
Kacey Zillner + Shannon Enk224 matchesnot enough data
Merritt Edwards + Lauren Ortis134 matchesnot enough data
Leslie Ricalde + Merritt Edwards303 matchesnot enough data
Ronda Walters + Mary Toce123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Alecia Seastrunk
14W–12L career · 11 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
Jessica Tufaro
10W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Amber Mata
19W–29L career · 22 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3
Ana Perdigao
12W–13L career · 11 lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.05
Jeanne Woodrick
10W–21L career · 17 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kacey Zillner
12W–4L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lauren Ortis
14W–12L career · 14 lines in 2025
not enough data
Leslie Ricalde
11W–13L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Toce
30W–23L career · 31 lines in 2025
not enough data
Merritt Edwards
29W–18L career · 26 lines in 2025
not enough data
Pamela Owen
10W–13L career · 11 lines in 2025
not enough data
Regina Knight
16W–19L career · 17 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ronda Walters
28W–14L career · 20 lines in 2025
not enough data
Shannon Enk
45W–27L career · 35 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stephanie Songy
17W–22L career · 21 lines in 2025
not enough data
Witney Arch
1W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.