Teams

1-CWilkins-ENO

2023 Eno River Mixed 18 & Over · 18 & Over Adult Mixed 10.0 Evening

11 players · average NTRP 4.69 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-07-25Won 10
W#1 DoublesJustin Panepinto / Jamie Breunig vs Jennifer Hiller / William Gray6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2023-06-27vs 3-TTed-Eno-10.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesPaulina Fernanda Delgado Andrade / Justin Panepinto vs Elizabeth Hodges / Robert Lightbourn6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2023-06-06vs 3-TTed-Eno-10.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesPaulina Fernanda Delgado Andrade / William Heim vs MacY Fisher / Matt Skelly4-6, 5-7
2023-05-23vs 2-KMedynskaya-Eno-10.0Split 11
L#1 DoublesJustin Panepinto / MaryBeth Jackson vs Jonathan Crooms / Heidi Steiber1-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesJake Wolfe / Paulina Fernanda Delgado Andrade vs Keith Ganz / Paige Lloyd6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult Mixed 10.0 Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.43 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.79
Justin Radloff
published
Justin Panepinto
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.66
Jamie Breunig
published 5
4.64
Connor Wilkins
published 5
4.50
Paulina Fernanda Delgado Andrade
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.46
MaryBeth Jackson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.34
Aneesh Kodali
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published 4.5
4.31
Richard Papantonis
published
4.20
Tanya Sirivolu
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
4.00
Emily Callahan
published 4.5
Jake Wolfe
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

MaryBeth Jackson + Aneesh Kodali314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Justin Radloff
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%5%
4.79
5
Justin Panepinto
46W–40L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
5
Jamie Breunig
10W–10L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%<1%
4.66
5
Connor Wilkins
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%<1%
4.64
4.5
Paulina Fernanda Delgado Andrade
62W–29L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%51%49%
4.50
4.5
MaryBeth Jackson
108W–57L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
4.46
4.5
Aneesh Kodali
119W–59L career · type A · 9 lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
4.34
Richard Papantonis
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
4.31
4.5
Tanya Sirivolu
95W–42L career · 6 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
4.20
4.5
Emily Callahan
10W–15L career · no lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
4.00
Jake Wolfe
5W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.