Teams

Ford 18+

2025 Baltimore Adult 18 & Over · Baltimore Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.69 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-06-14vs Charm City AcesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesChristina Makris / Tina Rohm vs Jamie Doehne / Melena McHale0-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKimberly Sandhu / Julie Edwards vs Marianela Castillo / Elizabeth Smith6-4, 6-2
2025-06-11vs Rauhofer - Volley GirlsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKimberly Sandhu / Julie Edwards vs Nicole Conkling / Sarah Walton7-6, 6-0
L#2 DoublesChristina Makris / Tina Rohm vs Steffie Cannella Beck / Carisa Husak4-6, 3-6
2025-06-04vs Charm City AcesWon 21
W#1 DoublesKimberly Ford / Kimberly Sandhu vs Ty Cronin / Jaimie Martell4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSanghee Lee / Tina Rohm vs Dorie Polakoff / Megan Flood6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesMichele Rosenstein / Kristin Seidl vs Marianela Castillo / Elena Lee0-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-05-31vs Rauhofer - Volley GirlsWon 30
W#1 DoublesKimberly Ford / Katherine Fluharty vs Nikki Alworth / Nicole Conkling6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTina Rohm / Christina Makris vs Amy Alevizatos / Steffie Cannella Beck6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKristin Seidl / Rebecca Stewart vs Stephanie Gallagher / Paige Horine6-2, 6-0
2025-05-19vs Rauhofer - Volley GirlsWon 20
W#1 SinglesBriana Stine vs Keyonna Baker6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRebecca Stewart / Christina Makris vs Jennifer Rauhofer / Alissa Wasser5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-05-08vs Charm City AcesWon 41
L#1 DoublesChristina Makris / Sanghee Lee vs Melena McHale / Jamie Doehne4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesBriana Stine vs Zaineb Makhzoumi6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLynne Cramer / Kristin Seidl vs Jennifer Swartout / Kelly Riepe6-1, 7-6
W#2 SinglesKimberly Sandhu vs Angelica Kim6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRebecca Stewart / Tina Rohm vs Jenna Sinkevitch / Elizabeth Smith6-1, 6-3
2025-04-27vs Rauhofer - Volley GirlsWon 21
W#1 DoublesKimberly Sandhu / Christina Makris vs Molly Sullivan / Nikki Alworth6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesRebecca Stewart / Kristin Seidl vs Paige Horine / Carisa Husak1-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesBriana Stine vs Sarah Walton6-1, 6-3
2025-04-14vs Charm City AcesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKimberly Sandhu / Kimberly Ford vs Rachel Ravalico / Melena McHale4-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesBriana Stine vs Jenna Sinkevitch6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Baltimore Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Katherine Fluharty
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.86
Kimberly Sandhu
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.64
Tina Rohm
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.50
Briana Stine
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.50
Sanghee Lee
published
3.46
Brooke Davidson
published 3.5
3.45
Kimberly Ford
published
3.39
Rebecca Stewart
published
3.36
Eva Simmons-O'Brien
published 3.5
3.24
Christina Makris
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.16
Karin Davis
published
3.05
Kristin Seidl
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Laura Bull
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kimberly Ford + Brooke Davidson314 matchesnot enough data
Tina Rohm + Christina Makris123 matchesnot enough data
Christina Makris + Kimberly Sandhu303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Katherine Fluharty
121W–58L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%56%43%
3.98
4
Kimberly Sandhu
274W–138L career · 10 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
3.86
4
Tina Rohm
130W–98L career · 5 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.64
3.5
Briana Stine
71W–31L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.50
Sanghee Lee
37W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.50
3.5
Brooke Davidson
16W–22L career · no lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.46
Kimberly Ford
55W–21L career · no lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
Rebecca Stewart
34W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Eva Simmons-O'Brien
79W–66L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
Christina Makris
53W–33L career · 6 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Karin Davis
22W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%12%88%
3.16
3.5
Kristin Seidl
66W–77L career · 4 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.05
Laura Bull
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.