Teams

Dill40/Knoxville

2026 Adult 40 & Over-Knoxville · 4.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 4.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-05-19vs Miller/KnoxvilleWon 21
L#1 DoublesAmanda Wilson / Cheryl Thompson vs Lindsey Stimets / Lisa Perkey6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesCynthia Pectol vs Katherine Cameron6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSarah Ross / Elizabeth Whelpley vs Nazo Burgy / Mei Ling Gingrich6-4, 6-1
2026-05-09vs Miller/KnoxvilleWon 20
W#2 DoublesAmanda Wilson / Elizabeth Whelpley vs Lisa Perkey / Mei Ling Gingrich6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKaren Lorino / Judy Shires vs Barbara Miller / Kris Gompert6-1, 6-2
2026-05-02vs Miller/KnoxvilleWon 40
W#1 DoublesKaren Lorino / Kate Willis vs Jill Stamper / Christina Kaak6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesCynthia Pectol vs Katherine Cameron6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMisty Cottrell / Rachel Kimmel vs Barbara Miller / Kathy Smith6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesKristie Danby / Robin Smith vs Lisa Perkey / Mei Ling Gingrich6-1, 6-2
2026-04-20vs Miller/KnoxvilleWon 21
L#1 DoublesKristie Danby / Robin Smith vs Jill Stamper / Christina Kaak6-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesMisty Cottrell / Rachel Kimmel vs Kathy Smith / Lisa Perkey6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKaren Lorino / Judy Shires vs Barbara Miller / Kris Gompert6-1, 6-7, 1-0
2026-04-16vs Miller/KnoxvilleSplit 22
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Henderson / Mary Emanuel vs Lindsey Stimets / Christina Kaak6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesRachel Kimmel vs Katherine Cameron4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKate Willis / Misty Cottrell vs Jill Stamper / Kathy Smith6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAmanda Wilson / Cheryl Thompson vs Kris Gompert / Nazo Burgy6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Dill40/Knoxville5015511118
2Miller/Knoxville0551533228

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.14 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.41
Karen Lorino
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.31
Mary Emanuel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Brooke Dill
published 4.5
Cynthia Pectol
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.20
Misty Cottrell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.16
Kristie Danby
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.12
Elizabeth Whelpley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.12
Kate Willis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.99
Rachel Kimmel
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.83
Cheryl Thompson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Judy Shires
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Lorino + Kate Willis8271% games+8.4% vs expected
Misty Cottrell + Rachel Kimmel8162% gamesnot enough data
Misty Cottrell + Kate Willis5161% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karen Lorino
24W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%76%23%
4.41
Mary Emanuel
10W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
1%92%7%
4.31
4.5
Brooke Dill
7W–11L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4.5
Cynthia Pectol
8W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Misty Cottrell
34W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
4.20
Kristie Danby
33W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%89%<1%
4.16
4.5
Elizabeth Whelpley
10W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
4.12
Kate Willis
27W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
4.12
Rachel Kimmel
36W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
54%46%<1%
3.99
4.5
Cheryl Thompson
4W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
91%9%<1%
3.83
Judy Shires
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.