Teams

LCTA (A) 3.5-2.5W 40 & Over (Kelly)

USTA 40 & Over Tri Level · 40 & Over 3.5-3.0-2.5 Women

16 players · average NTRP 2.90 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-05-30vs LCTA40/Brinson/LTPDIWon 20
W#2 DoublesBonnie Balderose / Karen Obrien vs Onkaran Arana Freita / Andrea Sullivan6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAlice Edwards / Jennifer Ireland vs Lindsey Arena / Lisa Grimmer6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2026-05-16vs LCTA40/Brinson/LTPDIWon 21
L#1 DoublesKatie Catalana / Virginie Murphy vs Laura Brinson / Erin Jesberger6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesBonnie Balderose / Karen Obrien vs Andrea Sullivan / Onkaran Arana Freita6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLauren Cason / Emily Judy vs Lindsey Arena / Meghan Bonagura6-4, 7-6
2026-05-09vs LCTA40/Brinson/LTPDIWon 20
W#2 DoublesKatie Catalana / McRae Hogan vs April Ginley / Andrea Sullivan6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMelissa Taylor / Lauren Cason vs Janet Machado / Leah Surles2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-05-05vs LCTA40/Brinson/LTPDILost 02
L#2 DoublesRebekah Lockhart / Amanda Mammele vs Jennifer Kennelly / Onkaran Arana Freita4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTheresa Cossel / Melissa Taylor vs Lisa Grimmer / Lindsey Arena1-6, 2-6
2026-04-25vs LCTA40/Brinson/LTPDILost 12
L#1 DoublesShannon Luther / Virginie Murphy vs Angela Parrott / Erin Jesberger4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesBonnie Balderose / Karen Obrien vs April Ginley / Kimberly Hough7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAlice Edwards / Jennifer Ireland vs Alex Earls / Janet Machado5-7, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over 3.5-3.0-2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Katherine Pauli
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Heidi Richter
published 3.5
3.06
Virginie Murphy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Shannon Luther
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.84
Bonnie Balderose
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.81
Katie Catalana
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.72
Amanda Mammele
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
McRae Hogan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.55
Lauren Cherry
published
2.54
Rebekah Lockhart
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.48
Theresa Cossel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.46
Jennifer Ireland
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.38
Lauren Cason
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.27
Emily Judy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Alice Edwards
published 2.5
Melissa Taylor
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bonnie Balderose + Katie Catalana3441% games−5.2% vs expected
Melissa Taylor + Katie Catalana123 matchesnot enough data
Rebekah Lockhart + Jennifer Ireland033 matchesnot enough data
McRae Hogan + Katie Catalana303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katherine Pauli
63W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Heidi Richter
20W–27L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Virginie Murphy
78W–77L career · 2 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.06
Shannon Luther
7W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
88%12%<1%
2.85
3
Bonnie Balderose
58W–37L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
2.84
Katie Catalana
47W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%92%8%
2.81
3
Amanda Mammele
33W–56L career · 1 line in 2026
4%94%2%
2.72
McRae Hogan
41W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
23%77%<1%
2.60
Lauren Cherry
19W–30L career · no lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
2.55
Rebekah Lockhart
21W–37L career · 1 line in 2026
38%62%<1%
2.54
Theresa Cossel
10W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
0%56%44%
2.48
Jennifer Ireland
31W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%62%38%
2.46
Lauren Cason
10W–58L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%83%17%
2.38
2.5
Emily Judy
6W–25L career · 1 line in 2026
0%96%4%
2.27
2.5
Alice Edwards
3W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Melissa Taylor
15W–24L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.