Teams

11 HCC Hardesty Mangin 7.0

2025 Richmond Mixed 18 & Over · Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 7.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-03-01vs 4 SCC Consolvo 7.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesBenjamin Andrews / Stacey Haug vs Laney Hyatt / Michael Hyatt2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesSusan Mangin / Jon Nystrom vs Kendall Consolvo / Brian Consolvo6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Wiertel / Neal Kauder vs Dean Deaver / Melissa Brunner-Brown2-6, 3-6
2025-01-18vs 21 ACAC Sloppy Joes 7.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesLisa Frazier / Jon Nystrom vs Gregory Cole / Lori Strobl4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSharon Mugford / Benjamin Andrews vs Jonathan Meade / Deanne Ralston5-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesAndrea Wassmer / Neil Powers vs Jean Davis / Tucker Martin3-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Beth Stinson
published 3.5
3.43
Scott Frazier
published
3.35
Jon Nystrom
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.33
Lisa Frazier
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Virginia Berents
published
3.26
Benjamin Andrews
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.22
Andrea Wassmer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Brad Hoffler
published 3.5
3.07
Sharon Mugford
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Neal Kauder
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Elizabeth Wiertel
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.98
Stacey Haug
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Krysten Bishop
published
Neil Powers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Mangin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Frazier + Scott Frazier4549% games−3.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Beth Stinson
27W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.49
Scott Frazier
15W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
Jon Nystrom
9W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
Lisa Frazier
17W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
Virginia Berents
9W–9L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Benjamin Andrews
3W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Andrea Wassmer
6W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Brad Hoffler
9W–9L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
Sharon Mugford
6W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.07
Neal Kauder
0W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.04
Elizabeth Wiertel
28W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.01
Stacey Haug
20W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%57%43%
2.98
Krysten Bishop
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Neil Powers
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Susan Mangin
2W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.