Teams

CCV RED

2023 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.17 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-07-10vs SS-H YELLOWWon 30
W#1 DoublesSari Nicholson / Julie Holt vs Karen Bebber / Linda McOsker6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLaura L Marturano / Laura Peterson vs Jennifer Milligan / Kathy Reiner6-7, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKirsten Despain / Karen Bielenberg vs Donna Rood / Carol Fowler6-3, 6-4
2023-07-03Won 10
W#3 DoublesKaren Bielenberg / Kirsten Despain vs Renee Cohen / Elise Lyons5-7, 6-0, 1-0
2023-06-26vs PRC BLUEWon 20
W#1 DoublesLaura L Marturano / Julie Holt vs Cindi Turchik / Shelley Hanna6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKaren Bielenberg / Sari Nicholson vs Lorie Whalen / Darlene Odean6-0, 6-1
2023-06-20vs SS-LT NAVYWon 10
W#3 DoublesKirsten Despain / Karen Bielenberg vs Audrey Simkins / Kimberly Jester7-5, 6-2
2023-06-12vs LTFC REDLost 01
L#2 DoublesKirsten Despain / Sari Nicholson vs Amy Shearer / Rebecca McIlwaine5-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Debra Downum
published 3.5
3.33
Laura L Marturano
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.16
Julie Holt
published
2.84
Taylor Spalding
published
Carissa Weinfeld
published 3
2.61
Kirsten Despain
published
2.61
Karen Bielenberg
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.54
Sari Nicholson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
LeAnn Sisson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura L Marturano + Julie Holt7550% games−1.2% vs expected
Sari Nicholson + LeAnn Sisson4450% games−3.1% vs expected
Kirsten Despain + Karen Bielenberg3343% games−5.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Debra Downum
19W–6L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Laura L Marturano
63W–42L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.33
Julie Holt
25W–13L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.16
Taylor Spalding
24W–9L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Carissa Weinfeld
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Christy Battaglia
22W–16L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kirsten Despain
7W–17L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
2.61
3
Karen Bielenberg
38W–54L career · 4 lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
2.61
3
Sari Nicholson
48W–40L career · 3 lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
2.54
LeAnn Sisson
6W–11L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.