Teams

TTA BLUE

2026 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 3.43 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-05-28vs RCC GREENWon 32
W#1 DoublesRossi Javernick / Sarah Vincent vs Meaghan Spiegel / Jaime Grantham7-5, 6-3
L#1 SinglesBridgitte Briggs vs Amelia Taljaard0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKelsa Morgan / Stephanie Saunders vs Tonya Johnson / Rachelle Schowe1-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesKaylee Henley vs Christine Nelson6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSara Mize / Diana Goodreau vs Kirsten Hefter / Madison Walz6-3, 7-6
2026-05-21vs LTA-P PURPLEWon 40
W#1 DoublesRossi Javernick / Sarah Vincent vs Kris Graham / Stephanie Stone6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesSara Mize vs Gloria Andrews6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKelsa Morgan / Jordan Smith vs Jennifer Arndt / Linda Ducay7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDiana Goodreau / Catherine Jankowski vs Kate Moin / Sally Meier6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2026-05-14vs LTA-Q ORANGELost 05
L#1 DoublesRossi Javernick / Catherine Jankowski vs Rebekah Harvey / Linda Vigil4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesStephanie Saunders vs Carmel Gill0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKaylee Henley / Kelsa Morgan vs Claire Simon / Stephanie Ohlsen6-7, 4-6
L#2 SinglesBridgitte Briggs vs Everett Johnson2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDiana Goodreau / Sara Mize vs Rachel Brittenham / Linda Prior5-7, 1-6
2026-05-07vs BTA-C REDWon 32
L#1 DoublesKelsa Morgan / Jordan Smith vs Emily Gaud / Jenny Bach6-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesStephanie Saunders vs Lindsey Killion4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesCatherine Jankowski / Sarah Vincent vs Stephanie Watson / Sally Lowell6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesKaylee Henley vs Mandy Jasper7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSara Mize / Diana Goodreau vs Christy Valentine / JORDAN KAAR6-4, 7-6
2026-04-30vs MEA GOLDWon 32
W#1 DoublesKelsa Morgan / Jordan Smith vs Jennifer Bray / Heather Ringoen6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesStephanie Saunders vs Megan Murray4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRossi Javernick / Sarah Vincent vs Michaele Hinojosa / Shawna Sharp5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 SinglesKaylee Henley vs Ridgley Straka6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesCatherine Jankowski / Bridgitte Briggs vs Jinfang Li / Teri Jean Fry1-6, 2-6
2026-04-23vs MEA GREENLost 23
W#1 DoublesRossi Javernick / Sarah Vincent vs Kara McDowell / Kristy Westnedge7-6, 6-2
L#1 SinglesStephanie Saunders vs Lindsay Sutula2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDiana Goodreau / Kelsa Morgan vs Hilary Talocco / Leslie Allen2-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesCatherine Jankowski vs Katherine Cooper4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKaylee Henley / Bridgitte Briggs vs Kira Zana / Alice Madden6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2026-04-16vs BCC REDLost 13
W#1 DoublesCatherine Jankowski / Rossi Javernick vs Rachel Forward / Beth Petersen6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKaylee Henley vs Nora Astley1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDiana Goodreau / Kelsa Morgan vs Dana Heather / Natalia Harms1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesBridgitte Briggs vs Katherine Honea3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Rossi Javernick
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.41
Kaylee Henley
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 3.5
3.36
Stephanie Saunders
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.35
Sara Mize
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.26
Sarah Vincent
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.25
Diana Goodreau
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.02
Bridgitte Briggs
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.97
Catherine Jankowski
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.88
Kelsa Morgan
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Catherine Jankowski + Rossi Javernick13756% games+6.9% vs expected
Diana Goodreau + Sara Mize8452% games+1.4% vs expected
Rossi Javernick + Sarah Vincent12855% games+1.4% vs expected
Catherine Jankowski + Kelsa Morgan2342% gamesnot enough data
Kelsa Morgan + Diana Goodreau0531% gamesnot enough data
Catherine Jankowski + Sarah Vincent314 matchesnot enough data
Catherine Jankowski + Diana Goodreau134 matchesnot enough data
Rossi Javernick + Kaylee Henley404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Rossi Javernick
77W–40L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%71%28%
3.42
3.5
Kaylee Henley
105W–44L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.41
Stephanie Saunders
18W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
3.36
3.5
Sara Mize
25W–21L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
3.35
Sarah Vincent
16W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Diana Goodreau
13W–33L career · 6 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.25
3.5
Bridgitte Briggs
0W–5L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
3.02
3
Catherine Jankowski
53W–65L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
2.97
3.5
Kelsa Morgan
39W–60L career · 7 lines in 2026
81%19%<1%
2.88

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.