Teams

Palma Ceia

2025 Hillsborough Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Men

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-03-22vs Cheval Knights - M. HayesWon 21
L#1 DoublesTodd Lax / James McAuley vs Amer Aldeen / Gregory Perpetua3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesDave Ward vs Matthew Hayes3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJohn Neal / Will Roberts vs Todd Abrams / Sundar Srinivasan4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-03-15vs Tampa Racquet - B. MurdockLost 01
L#2 DoublesRobert Cimino / Anthony Weiss vs Daren McGovern / Scott McGovern1-6, 1-6
2025-02-01vs Just Buck It - J. TorresLost 01
L#3 DoublesRobert Cimino / Anthony Weiss vs Joseph Harrington / Jean Pierre2-6, 5-7
2025-01-18vs SVB - D. LynhamLost 01
L#3 DoublesRobert Cimino / Anthony Weiss vs Luke Makar / Charles Constantine5-7, 2-6
2025-01-11vs Mirabay Rockets - P. FrancoSplit 22
W#1 DoublesJohn Neal / Will Roberts vs EA Gray / Luke Zoetmulder7-6, 6-2
L#1 SinglesTodd Lax vs Ricardo Squillantini4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJohn Eckermann / Dave Ward vs Bob Deveros / Nick Sexton6-2, 6-1
L#2 SinglesVick Seth vs Mohamed Aboul-Ezz2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
James McAuley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.78
Dave Ward
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.72
John Neal
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.63
Todd Lax
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.60
Will Roberts
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.52
James Kempton
published
3.47
Vick Seth
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.44
Robert Cimino
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.40
Joseph Wright
published
John Eckermann
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Neal + Will Roberts224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

James McAuley
7W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
1%85%14%
3.85
4
Dave Ward
6W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
John Neal
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Todd Lax
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.63
Will Roberts
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.60
James Kempton
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.52
Vick Seth
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
59%41%<1%
3.47
Robert Cimino
12W–33L career · 3 lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
3.44
Joseph Wright
0W–6L career · no lines in 2025
77%23%<1%
3.40
John Eckermann
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.