Teams

Liberty Park Tennis-Olsen/Thomas

2024 Winter League-Saturday · 3.5M Saturday

13 players · average NTRP 3.44 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-03-23vs Salt Lake Tennis-HellerWon 21
W#1 DoublesMatthew Boley / Clay Snaza vs Thomas Good / Nick Rowe5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesScott Olsen / Ryan Zabriskie vs Eric Barnhill / Brock Keddington4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesAndrew Thomas / Matthew Thomas vs Michael Isaza / Matthew Heller3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 DoublesMark Pett / Clay Snaza vs Todd Martin / Vivek Reddy7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRuss Paskins / Scott Olsen vs David Klein / Adam Lyle7-6, 7-6
L#3 DoublesTadd Killpack / Matthew Thomas vs Chris Lewon / Bryan DeHaan6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2024-03-09vs Sports Mall-PehrsonWon 21
W#1 DoublesAndrew Thomas / Matthew Thomas vs Alberto Cohen / Jason Nguyen6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesBradley Bolster / Clay Snaza vs Lonny Pehrson / Timothy Gribben5-7, 3-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMatthew Boley / Mark Pett vs Andrew McCubbins / Ryan Egan1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-02-24vs Ogden-LayLost 12
W#1 DoublesJohn Sirstins / Matthew Boley vs Kyle Robbins / Mosaati Vuki6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesScott Olsen / Bradley Bolster vs Travis Williamson / Brett Nestman2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesClay Snaza / Mark Pett vs Shawn Lay / Craig Christensen5-7, 4-6
2024-02-17vs Salt Lake Tennis-Ostrander/JonesLost 12
W#1 DoublesTy Lombardi / John Sirstins vs Floriano Ferreira / Nicholas Ujifusa6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMatthew Thomas / Scott Olsen vs Greg Ostrander / Trevor Pasmann5-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesBradley Bolster / Tadd Killpack vs Manti Hansen / Brian Smith6-4, 1-5, 0-1
2024-02-10vs Sunpro-McGill/FauxLost 03
L#1 DoublesTy Lombardi / Matthew Boley vs Brian Stewart / Hugh Olmstead4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesClay Snaza / Mark Pett vs Brent Barber / Michael Olson4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTadd Killpack / Bradley Bolster vs Kaden Henry / David McGill4-6, 5-3, 0-1
2024-02-03vs Sports Mall-Sato/SatoLost 12
L#1 DoublesMatthew Boley / John Sirstins vs Robbie Ballam / Patrick Williams2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRyan Zabriskie / Aaron Stobbe vs Edward Ekstrom / Thomas Young3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesBradley Bolster / Mark Pett vs Jonathan Luevano-Gonzalez / Josh Sato7-6, 7-6
2024-01-27vs Sports Mall-NelsonWon 30
W#1 DoublesAndrew Thomas / Tadd Killpack vs Krishna Sravanth Mannuru / JOSEPH BROWN6-4, 6-5
W#2 DoublesAaron Stobbe / Ryan Zabriskie vs Mike Johnson / Darren Nelson6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesClay Snaza / Mark Pett vs Daniel Cobbley / Brant Barney6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5M Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Ty Lombardi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Andrew Thomas
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Russ Paskins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Aaron Stobbe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
John Sirstins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Tadd Killpack
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.15
Clay Snaza
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Matthew Thomas
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.09
Mark Pett
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
2.86
Scott Olsen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Bradley Bolster
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Matthew Boley
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Ryan Zabriskie
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ty Lombardi + Bradley Bolster4157% games+7.2% vs expected
Mark Pett + Bradley Bolster5059% games+6.4% vs expected
Matthew Boley + John Sirstins6354% games+5.9% vs expected
Clay Snaza + Bradley Bolster3348% games+3.7% vs expected
Ty Lombardi + John Sirstins5452% games+2.1% vs expected
Andrew Thomas + Matthew Thomas9552% games+2.0% vs expected
Matthew Thomas + Aaron Stobbe7851% games+0.2% vs expected
Matthew Boley + Ty Lombardi5451% games−0.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ty Lombardi
178W–80L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Andrew Thomas
39W–26L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Russ Paskins
77W–63L career · 1 line in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Aaron Stobbe
40W–35L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
John Sirstins
96W–68L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Tadd Killpack
57W–88L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Clay Snaza
23W–46L career · 6 lines in 2024
15%85%1%
3.15
Matthew Thomas
63W–59L career · 4 lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Mark Pett
30W–54L career · 6 lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.09
Scott Olsen
41W–81L career · 4 lines in 2024
85%15%<1%
2.86
3
Bradley Bolster
90W–171L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%92%5%
2.78
Matthew Boley
66W–64L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Ryan Zabriskie
18W–13L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.