Teams

NJ BLACK

2023 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-22vs CP REDLost 01
L#1 DoublesKevin Thistle / David Lane vs Louis Bissette / Michael Evans2-6, 6-7
2023-07-18vs EM BLUELost 01
L#2 DoublesKevin Thistle / Jim Burgert vs Adam Davy / Pat Sullivan2-6, 3-6
2023-06-27vs CACM BLUEWon 20
W#1 DoublesJim Burgert / Chet Paris vs Tony Chapin / Charles Greenhouse6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPeter Malouff / Kevin Thistle vs David Duganne / Jay Rael6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2023-06-20vs WP REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesJim Burgert / Chet Paris vs Frankie Newman / John Randall6-3, 7-5
2023-06-13vs SKY GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesKevin Thistle / David Lane vs Philip Briere / Ross Goldstein1-6, 4-6
2023-06-06vs CM REDWon 10
W#3 DoublesKevin Thistle / John Hamilton vs Lee Johnson / Matthew Parsons6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Jim Burgert
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
David Lane
published 3.5
3.19
Brian Messer
published 3.5
3.17
Kevin Thistle
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.16
Tom Merkert
published
3.05
Paul Angelino
published
2.98
Chet Paris
published 3.5
2.87
John Hamilton
published
Glenn Friedman
published
Peter Malouff
published
Tim Doherty
published
WC Ackerman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tom Merkert + Paul Angelino6945% games−2.5% vs expected
John Hamilton + Kevin Thistle2537% games−8.7% vs expected
John Hamilton + Paul Angelino033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jim Burgert
134W–33L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.42
3.5
David Lane
24W–28L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Brian Messer
8W–15L career · no lines in 2023
9%89%1%
3.19
3.5
Kevin Thistle
90W–113L career · 5 lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.17
Tom Merkert
10W–10L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.16
Paul Angelino
7W–14L career · no lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
3.05
3.5
Chet Paris
3W–14L career · no lines in 2023
56%44%<1%
2.98
John Hamilton
5W–12L career · no lines in 2023
82%18%<1%
2.87
Glenn Friedman
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Peter Malouff
2W–13L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tim Doherty
3W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
WC Ackerman
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.