Teams

Patten/Wasta

2025 IA 18 & Over Adult Mixed League · 7.0 X'd 18 Over

12 players · average NTRP 3.33 / IOWA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-12-15vs BrownLost 03
L#1 DoublesPhilip Wasta / Shari Konarske vs Jodi Cobb / Patrick Cosgrove6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJake Thomsen / Caren Wasta vs Tom Randall / Suzi Carstensen3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesPeter Eddington / Carrie Corbett vs Muhannad Abu Nameh / Debra Callahan6-7, 4-6
2024-12-06vs RossSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDaryl Patten / Cait Klenk vs Jin Chang / Hillary Johnson-Jahangir6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesCheryl Patten / Samuel Patten vs Andrea Heffernan / Thomas Ross7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2024-11-15vs BrownLost 12
W#1 DoublesJake Thomsen / Caren Wasta vs Jodi Cobb / Patrick Cosgrove6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDaryl Patten / Carrie Corbett vs Amy Link / Joe Link3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Thinnes / David Thinnes vs Tom Randall / Suzi Carstensen1-6, 4-6
2024-11-01vs SteckelLost 03
L#1 DoublesPhilip Wasta / Caren Wasta vs Paolo Marilim / Trisha Welter1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPeter Eddington / Shari Konarske vs Patricia Conrad / Doug Infelt1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCheryl Patten / Daryl Patten vs Michelle Novak / Jeff Schadler3-6, 5-7
2024-10-18vs RossLost 12
L#1 DoublesJake Thomsen / Cait Klenk vs Carolyn Conlon / Jin Chang3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSamuel Patten / Cheryl Patten vs Rolando Sanchez / Cecilia Sung6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKaren Thinnes / David Thinnes vs Tracey Kramer / Austin Reutzel6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2024-10-06vs SteckelSplit 11
W#1 DoublesPhilip Wasta / Shari Konarske vs Mark Steckel / Penny Raia6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSamuel Patten / Cait Klenk vs Jeff Schadler / Mary Milavetz2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 7.0 X'd 18 Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Brown5114413142
2IA/Duhautois/18&Over7.0X5111716148
3Avilez339920161
4Patten/Wasta1551329188

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Jake Thomsen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.23
Cait Klenk
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Philip Wasta
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Cheryl Patten
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Shari Konarske
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.04
Karen Thinnes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Carrie Corbett
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.98
Caren Wasta
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.94
Samuel Patten
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Daryl Patten
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
David Thinnes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Peter Eddington
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cheryl Patten + Daryl Patten123 matchesnot enough data
Cheryl Patten + Samuel Patten033 matchesnot enough data
Cait Klenk + Samuel Patten033 matchesnot enough data
Peter Eddington + Carrie Corbett033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jake Thomsen
20W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Cait Klenk
17W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Philip Wasta
16W–32L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.20
3.5
Cheryl Patten
29W–29L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
Shari Konarske
21W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.13
Karen Thinnes
31W–35L career · 2 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.04
3.5
Carrie Corbett
23W–33L career · 2 lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
2.98
3.5
Caren Wasta
37W–45L career · 3 lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
2.98
Samuel Patten
9W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
2.94
3
Daryl Patten
8W–24L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
2.92
3
David Thinnes
1W–1L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Peter Eddington
0W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%92%3%
2.74

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.