Teams

Ford - Battlefield Ball Busters

2026 Fredericksburg Adult 55 & Over · Fredericksburg Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.42 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-03-15vs CaliriLost 02
L#1 DoublesJoan Donoghue / Debbie Kem vs Kim Gudyka / Judith Jobrack0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTara Ford / June Brick vs Bobbi Shoop / Donna Jones6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2026-03-08vs CaliriLost 02
L#1 DoublesLisa Palmer / Karla Kopec vs Emily Sereno / Julie Root2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTara Ford / Deborah Sukley vs Bobbi Shoop / Jill Huntington2-6, 1-6
2026-02-21vs CaliriLost 12
L#1 DoublesJoan Donoghue / Debbie Kem vs Leslie Caliri / Emily Sereno1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJune Brick / Cynthea Riesenberg vs Kim Gudyka / Judith Jobrack6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJudi Shoemaker / Karla Kopec vs Bobbi Shoop / Donna Jones4-6, 3-6
2026-02-15vs CaliriLost 03
L#1 DoublesDebbie Kem / Joan Donoghue vs Leslie Caliri / Julie Root6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMelissa Hutcheson / Lisa Palmer vs Meg Bohmke / Jill Huntington1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesTara Ford / Judi Shoemaker vs Widna Benitez / Judith Jobrack3-6, 2-6
2026-02-07vs CaliriSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJune Brick / Melissa Hutcheson vs Widna Benitez / Sabra Szczyglowski6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTara Ford / Deborah Sukley vs Amy French / Donna Jones1-6, 2-6
2026-02-01vs CaliriLost 12
L#1 DoublesKarla Kopec / June Brick vs Julie Root / Emily Sereno1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDebbie Kem / Melissa Hutcheson vs Meg Bohmke / Sabra Szczyglowski6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLisa Palmer / Tara Ford vs Amy French / Judith Jobrack6-7, 6-6
2026-01-17vs CaliriLost 03
L#1 DoublesCynthea Riesenberg / Lisa Palmer vs Leslie Caliri / Emily Sereno5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDeborah Sukley / Karla Kopec vs Meg Bohmke / Jill Huntington3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCarolyn Beckham / Tara Ford vs Kim Gudyka / Judith Jobrack4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Fredericksburg Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Caliri701838117
2Ford - Battlefield Ball Busters0731837237

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.12
Joan Donoghue
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Debbie Kem
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.12
Cynthea Riesenberg
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.12
Melissa Hutcheson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.09
Lisa Palmer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.97
Deborah Sukley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.96
Carolyn Beckham
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.94
Karla Kopec
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.89
Judi Shoemaker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.81
Tara Ford
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
June Brick
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joan Donoghue + Debbie Kem1126955% games−2.5% vs expected
Judi Shoemaker + Debbie Kem224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Joan Donoghue
200W–125L career · 3 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.12
3.5
Debbie Kem
233W–165L career · 4 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.12
3.5
Cynthea Riesenberg
1W–3L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.12
Melissa Hutcheson
10W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.12
Lisa Palmer
3W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.09
3.5
Deborah Sukley
0W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
2.97
3.5
Carolyn Beckham
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
61%39%<1%
2.96
Karla Kopec
0W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
68%32%<1%
2.94
3
Judi Shoemaker
112W–135L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.89
Tara Ford
20W–21L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
2.81
June Brick
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.