Teams

Belmont Berens Tri-level

2025 Richmond Tri-Level Weeknight · Richmond Tri-Level Weeknight 5.0, 4.5, 4.0 Women

15 players · average NTRP 4.31 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2025-09-25vs MAC-MessmerLost 01
L#2 DoublesJackie Berens / Michelle Wycinsky vs Lauren Palmer / Beth Gardner2-6, 4-6
2025-09-16vs 10 WW Cruel Summer - MurtaughLost 01
L#1 DoublesCarrie Boyd / Aynsley Fisher vs Jill Prince / Bobbie Lou Oley6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2025-09-10vs Westwood KellyWon 20
W#2 DoublesJamie Cochrane / Michelle Wycinsky vs Kate Huck / Anna Shea6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSusan Powell / Aynsley Fisher vs Michelle Baker / Mary LaFratta7-5, 6-1
2025-09-03vs Burkwood ButterworthWon 20
W#2 DoublesJackie Berens / Jamie Cochrane vs Ashley Hart / Katherine Carnohan6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCAROLYN WARD / Lindsay Bazydlo vs Kim Weis / Kathy Denunzio6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2025-08-28vs Westwood KellyWon 20
W#2 DoublesJackie Berens / Jamie Cochrane vs Kate Huck / Elizabeth Kelly6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCAROLYN WARD / Lindsay Bazydlo vs Sarah Oatts / Lauren Jones6-3, 6-1
2025-08-27vs MAC-MessmerLost 01
L#3 DoublesSusan Powell / Aynsley Fisher vs Heather Barefoot / Katherine McDowell5-7, 5-7
2025-08-20vs Westwood KellySplit 11
L#2 DoublesJackie Berens / Michelle Wycinsky vs Megan Alwine / Anna Shea1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSusan Powell / Aynsley Fisher vs Sarah Oatts / Lauren Jones6-2, 7-6
2025-08-18vs 6 MAC ScottLost 01
L#1 DoublesAynsley Fisher / Colleen Carter vs Mary Scott / Heather Barefoot1-6, 1-6
2025-08-13vs Burkwood ButterworthWon 10
W#3 DoublesRebecca Haener / Lindsay Bazydlo vs Robin Tyler / Kim Weis6-4, 6-0
2025-08-06vs MAC-MessmerWon 10
W#2 DoublesJackie Berens / Carol Gregory vs Lauren Palmer / Natalie Kim7-5, 6-3
2025-07-28Won 10
W#1 DoublesCarrie Boyd / Aynsley Fisher vs Grace Kim / Sarah Rowe6-4, 6-3
2025-07-23vs Burkwood ButterworthWon 10
W#3 DoublesCAROLYN WARD / Lindsay Bazydlo vs Lindsey O'Kane / Leanne Jones6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Tri-Level Weeknight 5.0, 4.5, 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.14 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.82
Clara Laing
published 5
4.68
Jamie Cochrane
published
4.63
Jenny Murray
published
4.55
Kim Morrissett
published
4.41
Jackie Berens
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.18
Rebecca Haener
published
4.05
Michelle Wycinsky
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.97
Susan Powell
published
3.97
Lindsay Bazydlo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.89
Abigail Dryden
published 4
3.85
Carol Gregory
published 4.5
3.80
CAROLYN WARD
published 4
3.71
Aynsley Fisher
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.48
Lindsey Howard
published
Megan Schwenk
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

CAROLYN WARD + Lindsay Bazydlo404 matchesnot enough data
Kim Morrissett + Jenny Murray213 matchesnot enough data
Clara Laing + Lindsey Howard303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Clara Laing
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.82
Jamie Cochrane
7W–3L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.68
Jenny Murray
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.63
Kim Morrissett
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.55
4.5
Jackie Berens
89W–50L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
4.41
Rebecca Haener
15W–17L career · no lines in 2025
9%89%1%
4.18
4.5
Michelle Wycinsky
120W–74L career · 3 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
4.05
Susan Powell
32W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.97
4
Lindsay Bazydlo
404W–144L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.97
4
Abigail Dryden
10W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.89
4.5
Carol Gregory
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
85%15%<1%
3.85
4
CAROLYN WARD
10W–6L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Aynsley Fisher
107W–109L career · 6 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
Lindsey Howard
6W–1L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
3.48
Megan Schwenk
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.