Teams

CDavis/LR/Rebs

2025 Adult 18 & Over Spring League 3.0,3.5,4.0 · 3.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-05-14vs Titus/Rock/LR/PVCCLost 05
L#1 DoublesSarah Rech / Yan Sun vs Megan Adams / Sarah Declerk0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesRegina Maher vs Shelby Fisher1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLeah Welker / Camille Davis vs Rachel Wayne / Christine Castillo2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesRoz Taylor vs Natalie Rockefeller0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJessica Doose / Sara Bryant vs Kathryn McMillian / Jana Law0-6, 1-6
2025-05-08vs Rider/Maumelle/BPLost 13
W#1 DoublesRegina Maher / Leah Welker vs Leandra Crook / Orena McClendon6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAmy Ross / Sarah Rech vs Sarah Hugen / Karen Shepherd1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesRoz Taylor vs Hope Rider2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJessica Doose / Sara Bryant vs Lydia Hunjan / Margaret Jackson3-6, 4-6
2025-04-28vs OATES/RVILLE/BPLost 03
L#1 DoublesSarah Rech / Amy Ross vs Susan Altrui / Emily Andrews-Clark2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesTeal Helton vs Shiloah Kviatkovsky4-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesRoz Taylor vs Tess Bradford3-6, 1-6
2025-04-22vs Glenn/TGarretson/Maumelle/BPLost 14
L#1 DoublesLeah Welker / Amy Ross vs Kisha Boston / Deanna Garretson4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesRoz Taylor vs Madeline Donahue2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBailey Smith / Jessica Doose vs Brooke Smith / Elly Rumbach0-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesRegina Maher vs Katie Rutledge3-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesTeal Helton / Sarah Rech vs Katelyn Lazenby / Natalie Gorman6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2025-04-10vs Jedlicka/LR/RebLost 05
L#1 DoublesSarah Rech / Yan Sun vs Hannah Lewis / Natasha Vincent1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesRoz Taylor vs Carmen Scruggs2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Ross / Abbey Hornbeck vs Brittany Holt / Susan Campbell2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesRegina Maher vs Laura Allmond2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSara Bryant / Teal Helton vs Ashley Cliff / Alexandria Wellborn3-6, 3-6
2025-03-17vs Brown/LR/BPLost 14
L#1 DoublesAmy Ross / Stefan Jones vs Kharyssa Brown / Robin Reed3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesRoz Taylor vs Lynn Stone1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLeah Welker / Katie Hicks vs Anita Junior / Lacey Watts4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 SinglesRegina Maher vs Dorian Craft0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCamille Davis / Bailey Smith vs Brittany Richardson Watson / Calandra Bucella1-6, 1-6
2025-03-13vs Overley/LR/CCLRLost 04
L#1 DoublesRoz Taylor / Leah Welker vs Maeghan Overley / Whitney Parfitt2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBailey Smith / Sarah Rech vs Lyndsey Sullivan / Melanie Prince3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesCamille Davis vs Elizabeth Blackshaw2-6, 0-3
L#3 DoublesStefan Jones / Jessica Doose vs Eliza Gaines / Bailey Pollock1-6, 2-6
2025-03-05vs Lane/Sisco/Stanley/Benton/RebLost 05
L#1 DoublesTeal Helton / Bailey Smith vs Shelby Stewart / Kristi Cortright1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesRoz Taylor vs Erika Johnson2-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesYan Sun / Leah Welker vs Sarah Sisco / Emily Gates3-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesRegina Maher vs Gracie Bailey2-6, 2-5
L#3 DoublesSarah Rech / Stefan Jones vs Brandi Watts / Holly Taylor0-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Katie Hicks
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.13
Regina Maher
usually #2 Singles 56%, also #1 Singles 22% · published
2.81
Jessica Doose
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.80
Anne McPherson
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Abbey Hornbeck
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.75
Roz Taylor
usually #2 Singles 47%, also #1 Singles 47% · published
2.68
Leah Welker
usually #1 Doubles 62%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published
2.63
Amy Ross
usually #2 Doubles 54%, also #1 Doubles 39% · published 3
2.59
Camille Davis
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
Sarah Rech
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
Teal Helton
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Yan Sun
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leah Welker + Regina Maher4163% games+24.0% vs expected
Abbey Hornbeck + Amy Ross3344% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katie Hicks
18W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34
Regina Maher
51W–25L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.13
Jessica Doose
23W–27L career · 9 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Anne McPherson
16W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
2.80
3
Abbey Hornbeck
5W–5L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Roz Taylor
10W–26L career · 15 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
Leah Welker
29W–27L career · 13 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Amy Ross
14W–16L career · 13 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
2.63
3
Camille Davis
11W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
2.59
Sarah Rech
9W–22L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data
Teal Helton
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Yan Sun
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.