Teams

Payne Park Hall 70

2025 Sarasota Social 70 & Over Winter · 7.0 W Wed Winter

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-03-26vs IslandWalk ThawleyWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesMona Harrington / Linda Kretlow vs Nancy Dickson / Mae Rose7-5, 6-0
2025-03-19vs IslandWalk ThawleyWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesMona Harrington / Linda Kretlow vs Mae Rose / Alaine Troisi6-3, 6-2
2025-03-12vs PP LacroixWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesMona Harrington / Linda Kretlow vs Cathy Belton / Peggy Hite6-2, 6-1
2025-03-05vs Meadows Purple YaYasWon 20
W#1 Female DoublesLinda Kretlow / Janet Hepner vs Terri Costa / Susan Gillis7-6, 6-3
W#2 Female DoublesJoan Hatch / Mona Harrington vs Becky Pomfret / Catherine Hynes6-1, 6-1
2025-02-26Won 20
W#1 Female DoublesJanet Hepner / Linda Kretlow vs Joan Hazen / Kara Ruffner6-4, 6-3
W#2 Female DoublesMona Harrington / JoMarie Privitera vs Joan Cadd / Mari Koerner6-1, 7-6
2025-02-12vs Courtside FeldmeierWon 10
W#2 Female DoublesMona Harrington / Linda Kretlow vs Sandi Gayheart / Mary Lou Irish6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2025-02-05vs PP LacroixWon 20
W#2 Female DoublesJanet Hepner / Linda Kretlow vs Jean Lacroix / Nancy LeFevre6-1, 6-1
W#3 Female DoublesJill Bressler / Mona Harrington vs Cathy Belton / Peggy Hite6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-01-29vs Meadows Purple YaYasWon 10
W#2 Female DoublesMona Harrington / Joan Hatch vs Barbara Boyle / Karen Matthews2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-01-15vs Courtside FeldmeierWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesMona Harrington / Janet Hepner vs Mary Louise Callahan / Jenny Spencer6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 W Wed Winter have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.24
Beverly Austgen
published 3.5
3.23
Marianne Zentz
published
Janet Hepner
published
Jill Bressler
published
JoMarie Privitera
published
Linda Kretlow
usually #1 Female Doubles 71%, also #2 Female Doubles 29% · published
Mona Harrington
usually #1 Female Doubles 44%, also #2 Female Doubles 44% · published
Sigi Moriece
published
Taffy Anderson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Kretlow + Mona Harrington181453% gamesnot enough data
Janet Hepner + Linda Kretlow7644% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Beverly Austgen
5W–11L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.24
Marianne Zentz
0W–7L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Janet Hepner
7W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jill Bressler
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
JoMarie Privitera
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Linda Kretlow
38W–26L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mona Harrington
128W–145L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sigi Moriece
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Taffy Anderson
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.