Teams

WNCD West (HRC)

Mixed 40 & Over USTA WNC 2025 · 40+ Mixed 3.5 - Thursday PM

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-07-24vs WNCB Carchman (Aston)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesQuenton Wright / Josh Wright vs Adriane Deeter / Victor Johnson2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTracy Becker / Andrew Cloyde vs Harvey Conner / Eva Hartman3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesChris Westmoreland / Tammy Wright vs Jennifer Yeisley / Alex Dwoinen3-6, 3-6
2025-07-10vs WNCB Carchman (Aston)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesDoug West / Tracy Becker vs Rebecca Carchman / Victor Johnson3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesQuenton Wright / Josh Wright vs Alex Dwoinen / Jennifer Yeisley1-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTammy Wright / Philip Burleson vs Amy Ager / Harvey Conner1-6, 2-6
2025-06-26vs WNCT Lancor (ARC-South)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesJosh Wright / Quenton Wright vs Hilawe Semunegus / Kelly Gillis1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesPhilip Burleson / Tracy Becker vs Stanley Treece / Christine Carson6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesChris Westmoreland / Tammy Wright vs Bob Wright / Tricia Lancor3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40+ Mixed 3.5 - Thursday PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Jennifer Kersey
published
3.35
Quenton Wright
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.26
Chris Westmoreland
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Kelly Emoff
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
Andrew Cloyde
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Tracy Becker
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.14
Josh Wright
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.11
Philip Burleson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.05
Tammy Wright
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Doug West
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Mitch Emoff
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Quenton Wright + Josh Wright1543% games−3.1% vs expected
Mitch Emoff + Kelly Emoff2641% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Kersey
27W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%16%
3.36
Quenton Wright
23W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Chris Westmoreland
15W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Kelly Emoff
61W–53L career · 6 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Andrew Cloyde
8W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Tracy Becker
4W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%92%3%
3.24
Josh Wright
39W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%16%84%
3.14
Philip Burleson
27W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%22%78%
3.11
Tammy Wright
26W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.05
Doug West
26W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.01
Mitch Emoff
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.