← Teams

WHRC-Fjeldsted

2023 Adult 18 & Over · 4.5 Men

7 players · average NTRP 4.43 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 4.07 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.51
Atom Fjeldsted
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4.5
4.10
Nathan Austin
usually #2 Doubles 25%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.08
Matt Simmering
usually #2 Doubles 29%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.07
Bradley Sumoge
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 4.5
4.06
Brendan Cunningham
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.86
Joshua Goddard
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
3.78
Shane Wilson
published 4
Results14 ties
2023-07-14Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesKarina Frid / Bradley Sumoge vs Sian Haworth-Liu / Thomas Jordan6-0, 6-0
2023-03-25Won 1–0
W#2 SinglesMatt Simmering vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-03-18Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesMichael Cheng / Matt Simmering vs Zach Bergthold / Jason Mah6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCraig Williams / Brendan Cunningham vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesNathan Austin vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-03-04Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesJoshua Goddard / Bradley Sumoge vs Lorne Bulling / Jan Wich-Herrlein6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMichael Cheng / Matt Simmering vs Asim Hafeez / Michael Sather6-1, 6-3
2023-02-26Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesAtom Fjeldsted / Josiah Petersen vs Elijah Nelson / Anthony Nelson6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesNathan Austin vs Conner Horrne6-1, 6-2
2023-02-18Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesNathan Austin / Brendan Cunningham vs Balasubramanian VembuSrinivasan / Eric Furuya2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMatt Simmering vs Prashanth Ramakrishnan6-3, 6-0
2023-02-11Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesSon Huynh / Joshua Goddard vs Joshua Owens / Bruce Sylva7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMatt Simmering / Eric Lee vs Toby Krauel / Darrell Hawkins6-3, 6-3
2023-01-29Lost 1–2
L#2 DoublesNathan Austin / Brendan Cunningham vs John Ezelle / Simon Collis6-2, 6-4
L#2 SinglesAtom Fjeldsted vs Juan Presichi6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBradley Sumoge / Joshua Goddard vs Adrien Leemin / Amahal Barbee4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-01-22Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesJoshua Goddard / Bradley Sumoge vs Bryan Ward / Daniel Larsen6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesEric Lee / Matt Simmering vs Dirk Koopman / Carson Hall6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAtom Fjeldsted / Josiah Petersen vs Christopher Haddon / Rodrigo Aguilar6-4, 6-3
2022-12-11Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesBradley Sumoge / Jennifer Tran vs Sarah Ferrer / Nick Hooker6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2022-12-10Split 1–1
W#2 DoublesAtom Fjeldsted / Paige Polizois vs Chelsea Glynn / William Anderson7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMatt Simmering / Rebecca Redding vs Allison Buchman / Honorato Wenceslao7-5, 6-4
2022-12-10Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesBradley Sumoge / Jennifer Tran vs Kelly Mohr / Steven Nguyen5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2022-12-10Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesAtom Fjeldsted / Suzanne Chambers vs Kevin Jarvis / Amy Bucher1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-12-09Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesBradley Sumoge / Jennifer Tran vs Jon Monson / Brooke Daugherty4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJoshua Goddard / Shanay Goddard vs William Anderson / Karen Ohollaren7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Atom Fjeldsted
83W–26L career
0%55%45%
4.51
4.5
Nathan Austin
67W–78L career
3%96%0%
4.10
4.5
Matt Simmering
104W–61L career
4%96%0%
4.08
4.5
Bradley Sumoge
83W–48L career
7%93%0%
4.07
4.5
Brendan Cunningham
53W–46L career
10%90%0%
4.06
4.5
Joshua Goddard
74W–48L career
52%48%0%
3.86
4
Shane Wilson
15W–13L career
1%97%2%
3.78

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.