Teams

Hermitage 5.5 - Ellis

2026 Richmond Combo Mixed · Richmond Combo Mixed 5.5

9 players · average NTRP 2.75 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings12 teams · Richmond Combo Mixed 5.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MAC - Haynes000000
2CORA Coyle Mixed Doubles 5.5000000
3MAC Biddle 5.5000000
4KRA Courting Chaos - Kaufmann000000
5MAC Novak 5.5000000
6Woodlake - Alcorn000000
7Willow Oaks - Burnett 5.5 2026000000
8ACAC Peskind 5.5000000
9Hermitage 5.5 - Ellis000000
10Westwood Belote/Sprinkle000000
11The Nunnalloway Netters-WW000000
12SCC Percy 5.5000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.56 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.10
Kathryn Horsley
published
3.02
Tyler Agee
published
2.74
Meghan Hale
published
2.58
2.48
Joel McClellan
published
2.20
Brady Hale
published 2.5
2.19
Samantha Mcclellan
published
2.16
Rachel Ellis
published
Patrick Horsley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Samantha Mcclellan + Joel McClellan4552% games−3.5% vs expected
Kathryn Horsley + Patrick Horsley8652% gamesnot enough data
Meghan Hale + Brady Hale2447% gamesnot enough data
Rachel Ellis + Christopher Ellis4160% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathryn Horsley
50W–24L career · no lines in 2026
<1%24%76%
3.10
Tyler Agee
9W–6L career · no lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.02
Meghan Hale
25W–19L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Christopher Ellis
10W–6L career · no lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
2.58
Joel McClellan
18W–18L career · no lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
2.48
2.5
Brady Hale
2W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.20
Samantha Mcclellan
9W–12L career · no lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19
Rachel Ellis
6W–3L career · no lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.16
Patrick Horsley
8W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.