Teams

RIDGEMARK G&CC 40MX7.0A

2023 MIXED 40&Over · 40&Over MX7.0

20 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 40&Over MX7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Johan Moser
published
3.69
Geoffrey Lambrechts
published
3.68
Rachel Banse
published
3.60
Bonnie Chamchawee
published 3.5
3.44
Kim Horton
published
3.42
Tracy Taggart
published
3.40
Jeff Culler
published
3.32
KRISTEN SAXON
published
3.32
Allison Rohnert
published 3.5
3.30
Tina Clark
published
3.29
John Machmiller
published
Adolfo Sanchez
published 3.5
3.22
Norm Burchard
published
3.18
Sandy Barker
published
3.13
Aida Cazares
published 3.5
2.90
2.81
Diana M Sanchez
published 3
Greg Orsetti
published
Matt Kirkland
published
Robert Frusetta
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Johan Moser
5W–12L career · no lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
4.02
Geoffrey Lambrechts
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.69
Rachel Banse
14W–15L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
3.5
Bonnie Chamchawee
83W–30L career · no lines in 2023
<1%24%76%
3.60
Kim Horton
22W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
3.44
Tracy Taggart
9W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
3.42
Jeff Culler
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
75%25%<1%
3.40
KRISTEN SAXON
14W–21L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Allison Rohnert
44W–41L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.32
Tina Clark
20W–17L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.30
John Machmiller
6W–5L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Adolfo Sanchez
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Norm Burchard
8W–9L career · no lines in 2023
98%2%<1%
3.22
Sandy Barker
9W–8L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Aida Cazares
8W–16L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.13
3
Deborah Armstrong
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
2.90
3
Diana M Sanchez
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
2.81
Greg Orsetti
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Matt Kirkland
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Robert Frusetta
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.