Teams

1-LDavis-Eno

2023 Eno River Mixed 40 & Over · 40 & Over Adult Mixed 6.0 Evening

13 players · average NTRP 2.94 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2023-07-27vs 3-MSanchez-ENO-40 6.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesWill Gresham / Kristin Cooley vs Matthew Feldt / Kolleen Fitzgerald6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesNeal Sugg / Kerry Espinola vs Kelly Shirley / Jennifer Magee6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMarvin Davis / Loralie Bible vs Ryan Boyles / Susan Graff6-2, 6-1
2023-07-20vs 4-YDeaver-Eno-MixedLost 02
L#2 DoublesNeal Sugg / Pamela Howell-Davis vs Polly Hilsabeck / Matt Carter3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLoralie Bible / Will Gresham vs Jimi Harrison / Okeith GREENE6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2023-07-13vs 5-AHabib-HRSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCarl Laird / Pamela Howell-Davis vs Cheryl Bock / Mark Fossum6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesWill Gresham / Annaliese Gresham vs Barbie McGarrah / Rob McGarrah6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-07-09vs 3-MSanchez-ENO-40 6.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesLiz Schaller / Bill Schaller vs Amy Gillespie / Matthew Feldt1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKerry Espinola / Neal Sugg vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesCarl Laird / Amanda Laird vs Keith Buckel / Kolleen Fitzgerald3-6, 3-6
2023-07-06vs 6-DLiller-HSLost 03
L#1 DoublesNeal Sugg / Kerry Espinola vs Chris Konvalinka / Tracy Stefan1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesPamela Howell-Davis / Marvin Davis vs Scott Hartman / Dori Liller5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesWill Gresham / Annaliese Gresham vs Andy Jones / Jennifer Hoffmann5-7, 2-6
2023-06-29vs 2-JMontague-CCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesAmanda Laird / Carl Laird vs Brent Fox / Nancy Sickel3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMarvin Davis / Loralie Bible vs Mary T Long / Travis Angle1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLiz Schaller / Will Gresham vs Robert Long / Jennifer Edmunds6-2, 6-0
2023-06-15vs 4-YDeaver-Eno-MixedLost 01
L#2 DoublesCarl Laird / Amanda Laird vs Yolanda Deaver / Chester Farley2-6, 1-6
2023-06-08vs 5-AHabib-HRSplit 11
L#2 DoublesAnnaliese Gresham / Russell Davis vs Cheryl Bock / Mark Fossum5-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLori Davis / Carl Laird vs Faten Habib / Ashraf Habib6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2023-06-01vs 6-DLiller-HSLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnnaliese Gresham / Russell Davis vs Nicole Dolan / Valdis Stiebris2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesGene Brady / Pamela Howell-Davis vs Michael Holt / Jennifer Hoffmann2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLiz Schaller / Bill Schaller vs Laura Webb-Murrah / Jeff Denhard2-6, 3-6
2023-05-25vs 2-JMontague-CCCLost 02
L#1 DoublesLoralie Bible / Carl Laird vs Katie Elder / Rick Edmunds5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesNeal Sugg / Kerry Espinola vs Chuck Clark / Beth Clark2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult Mixed 6.0 Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Kristin Cooley
published
3.55
Loralie Bible
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.90
Will Gresham
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.84
Carl Laird
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.83
Russell Davis
published
2.71
Liz Schaller
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.69
Kerry Espinola
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.69
Marvin Davis
published
2.59
Pamela Howell-Davis
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.43
Bill Schaller
published 3
2.40
Amanda Laird
published 2.5
2.38
Annaliese Gresham
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Neal Sugg
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Annaliese Gresham + Will Gresham3840% gamesnot enough data
Liz Schaller + Bill Schaller1439% gamesnot enough data
Pamela Howell-Davis + Russell Davis314 matchesnot enough data
Carl Laird + Pamela Howell-Davis123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristin Cooley
56W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%9%91%
3.68
3.5
Loralie Bible
186W–65L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%35%65%
3.55
3
Will Gresham
11W–21L career · type M · 5 lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
2.90
3
Carl Laird
42W–77L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
2.84
Russell Davis
8W–11L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Liz Schaller
76W–108L career · type A · 3 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
2.71
3
Kerry Espinola
130W–131L career · 4 lines in 2023
7%92%1%
2.69
Marvin Davis
10W–24L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Pamela Howell-Davis
120W–146L career · 4 lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
2.59
3
Bill Schaller
3W–16L career · type A · no lines in 2023
70%30%<1%
2.43
2.5
Amanda Laird
16W–22L career · no lines in 2023
0%78%22%
2.40
2.5
Annaliese Gresham
70W–81L career · 4 lines in 2023
0%82%18%
2.38
Neal Sugg
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.