Teams

Lunsford/Memphis

2026 Combo 18 & Over - Memphis · 6.5 18 & Over Women

16 players · average NTRP 2.88 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2026-08-08vs Grear/MemphisWon 21
W#1 DoublesLauren Cunningham / Breeana Crouch vs Laura Beth Gabriel / Jennifer Gladstone6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLauren Heard / Danielle Brewer vs Mariangeles Grear / Sarah Heard6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAmy Smythe / Maria Foley vs Megan Sousoulas / Mary Smith5-7, 5-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 18 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Kyle Denney
published
3.06
Lauren Heard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Kayleigh Mitchell
published
3.02
Ashley Lunsford
published 3
2.99
Breeana Crouch
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.93
Ashley Akil
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.92
Maria Foley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Lauren Cunningham
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.84
Jean Phebus
published
2.84
Natalie Souder
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.83
Sally Gillum
published
2.79
Kelly Crowe
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.65
Natalie McLean
published
2.62
Lyndsay Gronostaj
published
2.60
Monica Burt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.43
Amy Smythe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ashley Akil + Monica Burt10265% games+19.2% vs expected
Lyndsay Gronostaj + Ashley Lunsford4646% games−0.2% vs expected
Jean Phebus + Lauren Heard314 matchesnot enough data
Amy Smythe + Lyndsay Gronostaj033 matchesnot enough data
Amy Smythe + Maria Foley213 matchesnot enough data
Kyle Denney + Natalie Souder033 matchesnot enough data
Breeana Crouch + Natalie Souder213 matchesnot enough data
Breeana Crouch + Lauren Heard213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kyle Denney
14W–7L career · no lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
3.07
Lauren Heard
19W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%33%67%
3.06
Kayleigh Mitchell
15W–4L career · no lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.02
3
Ashley Lunsford
33W–23L career · no lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.02
3
Breeana Crouch
12W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
2.99
3
Ashley Akil
29W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.93
Maria Foley
12W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%71%29%
2.92
Lauren Cunningham
13W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%72%28%
2.92
Jean Phebus
18W–16L career · no lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.84
Natalie Souder
14W–22L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.84
Sally Gillum
23W–16L career · no lines in 2026
1%87%12%
2.83
Kelly Crowe
21W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
Natalie McLean
3W–3L career · no lines in 2026
14%85%1%
2.65
Lyndsay Gronostaj
23W–28L career · no lines in 2026
0%19%81%
2.62
Monica Burt
14W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%25%75%
2.60
2.5
Amy Smythe
16W–17L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%68%32%
2.43

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.