Teams

Villages - Hoops

2023 Marion Trilevel 18 & Over · 3.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.60 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2023-09-23vs MARION/Chak/Tri-Level4.0/3.5/3.0WLost 01
L#1 DoublesElaine Parker / Terry Shick vs Beth Riendeau / Kelly Lauman5-7, 2-6
2023-09-22vs MARION/Chak/Tri-Level4.0/3.5/3.0WLost 01
L#1 DoublesTerry Shick / Elaine Parker vs Beth Riendeau / Natalie Slatton1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Erica Migliorati
published 4
3.48
Elaine Parker
published 4
3.40
Judy Hoops
published
3.36
Lucy Kaul
published
3.34
Ann-Marie Chouinard
published 3.5
3.31
Catherine Sersen
published 3.5
3.09
Maggie Berardi
published
2.63
Betsy Calder
published 3
Sueanne Mazzurco
published
Terry Shick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Judy Hoops + Ann-Marie Chouinard8554% games−3.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Erica Migliorati
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Elaine Parker
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
55%45%<1%
3.48
Judy Hoops
16W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.40
Lucy Kaul
19W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
3.36
3.5
Ann-Marie Chouinard
10W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Catherine Sersen
8W–3L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.31
Maggie Berardi
13W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%25%75%
3.09
3
Betsy Calder
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
2.63
Sueanne Mazzurco
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Terry Shick
90W–52L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.