Teams

SD 4.0 Mountain View/ Alvarez

2022 So Cal Fall Doubles - San Diego · SD Women 4.0

13 players · average NTRP 4.11 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#3 DoublesClara Huerta / Fabiola Flores vs Christine Golemb / Janene Christopher3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-11-09vs SD LLW 4.0 Coronado TC / WebsterLost 01
L#2 DoublesFabiola Flores / Cynthia Herrera vs Jada Cade / Debbie McBride1-6, 4-6
2022-10-26vs SD 4.0 SDTRC / OttLost 01
L#2 DoublesBeth Timpe / Luisa Garcia de la Cabada vs Kerry Ott / Sandy Dielman3-6, 1-6
2022-10-12vs SD 4.0 SDTRC/ HansonLost 01
L#1 DoublesAngie Colonna / Fabiola Flores vs Carol Harris / Jennie Blacker6-2, 6-7, 0-1
2022-10-05vs SD LLW 4.0 Coronado TC / WebsterWon 20
W#2 DoublesBeth Timpe / Clara Huerta vs Gladys Esponda / Cristina Rassvetaieff6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSusie Alvarez / Fabiola Flores vs Gina Freize / Meredith White6-2, 6-1
2022-09-28vs SD 4.0 Mountain View/ KilleenLost 01
L#3 DoublesSusie Alvarez / Cynthia Herrera vs Rosie Wagner / Chigusa Okubo6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAngie Colonna / Fabiola Flores vs Elsie Hammond / Diana Kirkland6-0, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Cynthia Herrera
published 4.5
4.19
Angie Colonna
published 4.5
4.12
Sandra Lopez
published
4.08
Fabiola Flores
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.93
ANGIE CRAWFORD
published 4
3.79
Beth Timpe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
Clara Huerta
published 4
3.66
NORA TORRES
published
3.58
Becky Yzaguirre
published 4
3.42
Susie Alvarez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.34
Adriana Diaz
published 3.5
3.20
Roxana Balboa
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susie Alvarez + NORA TORRES0820% games−24.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Cynthia Herrera
14W–11L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
4.29
4.5
Angie Colonna
8W–10L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
4.19
Sandra Lopez
9W–8L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
4.12
4.5
Fabiola Flores
125W–102L career · 5 lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
4.08
4
ANGIE CRAWFORD
23W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
3.93
4
Beth Timpe
99W–76L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.79
4
Clara Huerta
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.79
NORA TORRES
3W–10L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.66
4
Becky Yzaguirre
6W–21L career · no lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
3.58
4
Susie Alvarez
84W–81L career · 2 lines in 2022
73%27%<1%
3.42
3.5
Adriana Diaz
15W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
3.34
Luisa Garcia de la Cabada
0W–10L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
Roxana Balboa
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.