Teams

Terminetters

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER · Ladies 4.0 - 18 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 3.80 / WYOMING

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2021-07-03vs Forever 18Lost 03
L#1 SinglesNancy Peck vs Megan Hayes1-6, 4-4
L#2 DoublesJanet Stanforth-Nachtigal / Alyson Hagy vs Dodi Campbell / Cheryl Johnson1-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSharon Buccino / Ginger Paige vs Rene Williams / Sheri Foster4-6, 3-6
2021-06-27vs Forever 18Lost 03
L#1 DoublesCathy Gorbett / Patricia Hansen vs Cheryl Johnson / Anne Moore3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJanet Stanforth-Nachtigal / Alyson Hagy vs Sheri Foster / Michelle Schilling6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSandy Lang / Sharon Buccino vs Ellen Laubhan / Megan Hayes4-6, 4-6
2021-06-26vs Forever 18Lost 04
L#1 DoublesJanet Stanforth-Nachtigal / Patricia Hansen vs Troy Ibarra / Anne Moore6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCathy Gorbett / Ginger Paige vs Vicky Kmetz / Megan Hayes2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 SinglesNancy Peck vs Rene Williams4-6, 5-3
L#3 DoublesSandy Lang / Sharon Buccino vs Sheri Foster / Michelle Schilling7-6, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ladies 4.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Rachel Lamont
usually #1 Singles 78%, also #2 Singles 11% · published 4.5
Alyson Hagy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Cathy Gorbett
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.17
Ginger Paige
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.16
Patricia Hansen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Janet Stanforth-Nachtigal
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Nancy Peck
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Sandy Lang
published
Sharon Buccino
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cathy Gorbett + Ginger Paige1437% games−5.7% vs expected
Patricia Hansen + Ginger Paige81142% games−10.1% vs expected
Sharon Buccino + Alyson Hagy1649% gamesnot enough data
Alyson Hagy + Janet Stanforth-Nachtigal2448% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Peck + Alyson Hagy213 matchesnot enough data
Patricia Hansen + Janet Stanforth-Nachtigal033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Rachel Lamont
44W–47L career · 9 lines in 2021
51%49%<1%
4.00
4
Alyson Hagy
13W–25L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Cathy Gorbett
8W–22L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Ginger Paige
27W–57L career · type A · 3 lines in 2021
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Patricia Hansen
26W–60L career · 3 lines in 2021
10%89%<1%
3.16
Janet Stanforth-Nachtigal
13W–16L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Nancy Peck
22W–9L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Sandy Lang
6W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Sharon Buccino
16W–17L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.