Teams

IE-CCCC-Kay

2025 Mixed 55 & Over · Mixed 7.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-11-30vs IE-TCC-CardonaLost 01
L#3 DoublesSteve Clark / Sesilie Kay vs Marie Honda / Mark Mendoza4-6, 6-7
2025-11-09vs IE-TCC-CardonaLost 02
L#1 DoublesScott Soren / Janet Giles vs Marie Honda / Ling Wong6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPhil Taylor / Kelly Bollmann vs Charlotte Pereira Reisch / Paul Reisch1-6, 3-6
2025-10-26vs IE-TCC-CardonaSplit 11
W#2 DoublesScott Soren / Dana Dotoli vs Ling Wong / Marie Honda6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesPhil Taylor / Kelly Bollmann vs Mark Mendoza / Mara Watkins0-6, 1-6
2025-10-11vs IE-LLW-Redlands-HoakLost 12
L#1 DoublesDana Dotoli / Scott Soren vs Wonsik Bollmann / Jane Magro4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesIlse Ungeheuer / Gopal Dhingra vs Ronald Bone / Lo Ling Lozoya3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKelly Bollmann / Phil Taylor vs Stewart Anderson / Laurie McNaughton6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2025-09-21vs IE-LLW-Redlands-HoakLost 02
L#1 DoublesScott Soren / Dana Dotoli vs Ronald Bone / Lo Ling Lozoya6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesIlse Ungeheuer / Gopal Dhingra vs Jean Kielhold / Kennett Lai2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mixed 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Julie Perkins
published
3.68
Scott Soren
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.51
Kelly Bollmann
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.41
Ilse Ungeheuer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.40
Janet Giles
published
3.27
Dana Dotoli
published 3.5
Carsten Seemann
published 3.5
2.69
Sesilie Kay
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Gary Johnson
published
Phil Taylor
published
Steve Clark
published
Steve Richardson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sesilie Kay + Scott Soren303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Perkins
8W–10L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Scott Soren
82W–44L career · 4 lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.68
3.5
Kelly Bollmann
73W–87L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.51
3.5
Ilse Ungeheuer
89W–80L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.41
Janet Giles
18W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Dana Dotoli
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Carsten Seemann
1W–0L career · type M · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Sesilie Kay
133W–145L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
Gary Johnson
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Phil Taylor
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Steve Clark
3W–12L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Steve Richardson
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.