Teams

Cameron/Pruner

2024 Tri Level Men · 4.5,4.0,3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.75 / WESTERN REGION

View scouting list →
Schedule13 played
2024-12-08vs Kelly/StohrWon 20
W#2 DoublesChristopher Cameron / Nathan Allen vs Konstantin Kunze / Darren Stohr6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesAlan Grossfield / Andrew Kita vs Ray Kim / Ryan Mott7-6, 6-2
2024-11-24vs Miller/HuberSplit 11
W#2 DoublesNathan Allen / William Britton vs Aaron Huber / Brian Mosher6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesEric Hetzke / Alex Casale vs Kevin Luong / William Jacobs3-6, 5-7
2024-11-16vs Unit TurnWon 30
W#1 DoublesRajesh Barnabas / Vivek Chandra Hundi Nagaraju vs Matt Damico / Aarne Lees6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTyler Luong / Mathieu Barthelemy vs Mark Wlodarczyk / David Vega7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMukesh M / Alex Casale vs Kurt Meichtry / Robert Tran6-2, 6-2
2024-11-09vs BuppLost 12
L#1 DoublesNathan Allen / Dominic Vito vs Michael Bupp / Stephen Repass6-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesChristopher Cameron / William Britton vs Gregg Hartvigsen / Nick Hunter6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesNeeraj Buch / Alan Grossfield vs Anto Beslic / Chris Crockett2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-11-02vs ROC: All Love No FightLost 03
L#1 DoublesEthan Yung / Vimal Seshadri Raguraman vs Spencer Ekola / Justin Lansinger6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesStephen Heinzelman / Rajesh Barnabas vs Kyle Sherry / Eugene Kobyakov3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAlex Casale / Mukesh M vs Stephen Watson / Trevor Ritchie5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2024-10-26vs Kelly/StohrWon 20
W#2 DoublesNathan Allen / Mathieu Barthelemy vs John Miller / Adam Moran5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNeeraj Buch / Eric Hetzke vs Ryan Paddock / David Gibbons6-3, 6-0
2024-10-19vs Miller/HuberSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMathieu Barthelemy / Stephen Heinzelman vs Andrew Miller / Andrew Johnson6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesEric Hetzke / Andrew Kita vs Kevin Luong / William Jacobs4-6, 6-7
2024-10-13vs Unit TurnSplit 11
L#2 DoublesNeeraj Buch / Tyler Luong vs Aarne Lees / Selwyn Mitchell3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAlex Casale / Mukesh M vs Kurt Meichtry / David Vega7-6, 6-1
2024-10-04vs BuppWon 20
W#2 DoublesMathieu Barthelemy / Nathan Allen vs Manuel Castillo / Michael Bupp6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesNeeraj Buch / Andrew Kita vs Anto Beslic / Graham Brown6-0, 6-4
2024-09-29vs ROC: All Love No FightSplit 11
L#2 DoublesRajesh Barnabas / Mathieu Barthelemy vs Cliff Bundick / Kyle Sherry1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesEric Hetzke / Alex Casale vs Chris Fisher / Aldo Mey6-4, 6-2
2024-02-04Won 10
W#2 DoublesKyle Williams / Alan Grossfield vs David Marshall / Scott Handy4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-01-07vs Kelly/StohrWon 10
W#2 DoublesAlan Grossfield / Kyle Williams vs Ryan Mott / Amit Revankar6-2, 6-3
2023-12-10vs ROC: Dyson/TranLost 01
L#1 DoublesAlan Grossfield / Michael Ellman vs Gary Saffran / Jacob Saffran4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 4.5,4.0,3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Miller/Huber82201024242
2ROC: All Love No Fight8221926256
3Kelly/Stohr64191125265
4Cameron/Pruner55161429258
5Unit Turn2882247315
6Bupp1962452340

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Ethan Yung
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.96
Tyler Luong
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.77
Neeraj Buch
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.71
Andrew Kita
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.71
Alan Grossfield
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.67
Christopher Cameron
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.54
Alex Casale
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Eric Hetzke
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Nathan Allen
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Rajesh Barnabas
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Stephen Heinzelman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rajesh Barnabas + Christopher Cameron224 matchesnot enough data
Neeraj Buch + Alan Grossfield134 matchesnot enough data
Eric Hetzke + Alex Casale314 matchesnot enough data
Nathan Allen + Ethan Yung123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Ethan Yung
9W–8L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Tyler Luong
20W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%61%39%
3.96
Neeraj Buch
11W–16L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
3.5
Andrew Kita
7W–2L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%5%95%
3.71
3.5
Alan Grossfield
30W–28L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%5%95%
3.71
4
Christopher Cameron
36W–40L career · 2 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.67
3.5
Alex Casale
14W–10L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%39%61%
3.54
3.5
Eric Hetzke
11W–5L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Nathan Allen
35W–7L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Rajesh Barnabas
10W–5L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Stephen Heinzelman
18W–41L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.